llvm dev - Jun 2008 - [LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure

> Makes sense to me. If you built with and without LDFLAGS enabled
> should probably just commit it - or do you need someone to commit for
> you?
I can commit it. I was just not sure if this was an intentional
difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if
it pass.
> -eric
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Avila de Espindola

Google Ireland Ltd.
Gordon House
Barrow Street
Dublin 4
Ireland

Registered in Dublin, Ireland
Registration Number: 368047

> I can commit it. I was just not sure if this was an intentional
> difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if
> it pass.
The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to commit:

svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
'/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f': 400
Bad Request (http://llvm.org)

Any idea what could be wrong?

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Avila de Espindola

Google Ireland Ltd.
Gordon House
Barrow Street
Dublin 4
Ireland

Registered in Dublin, Ireland
Registration Number: 368047

On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to  
> commit:
>
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: MKACTIVITY of
> '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f':
400
> Bad Request (http://llvm.org)
>
> Any idea what could be wrong?
Nope, not really...  but google found:

   http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=152&t=123806

for me.  Another post suggests using https instead of http.

Any yet another suggests antivirus software can muck with it, if  
running Kaspersky, add svnclient to the Kaspersky Trust Region.  :-)   
Whee...