Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9c3c".
Did you mean:
93c
2008 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
> Makes sense to me. If you built with and without LDFLAGS enabled
> should probably just commit it - or do you need someone to commit for
> you?
I can commit it. I was just not sure if this was an intentional
difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if
it pass.
> -eric
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
2008 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
...this was an intentional
> difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if
> it pass.
The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to commit:
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: MKACTIVITY of
'/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f': 400
Bad Request (http://llvm.org)
Any idea what could be wrong?
Cheers,
--
Rafael Avila de Espindola
Google Ireland Ltd.
Gordon House
Barrow Street
Dublin 4
Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland
Registration Number: 368047
2008 Jun 19
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to
> commit:
>
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: MKACTIVITY of
> '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f': 400
> Bad Request (http://llvm.org)
>
> Any idea what could be wrong?
Nope, not really... but google found:
http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=152&t=123806
for me. Another post suggests using https instead of http.
Any yet another suggests antivirus sof...