search for: d39e89ade19f

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d39e89ade19f".

2008 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
> Makes sense to me. If you built with and without LDFLAGS enabled > should probably just commit it - or do you need someone to commit for > you? I can commit it. I was just not sure if this was an intentional difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if it pass. > -eric > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list
2008 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
...was an intentional > difference. I am running a bootstrap without a LDFLAGS. Will commit if > it pass. The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to commit: svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: MKACTIVITY of '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f': 400 Bad Request (http://llvm.org) Any idea what could be wrong? Cheers, -- Rafael Avila de Espindola Google Ireland Ltd. Gordon House Barrow Street Dublin 4 Ireland Registered in Dublin, Ireland Registration Number: 368047
2008 Jun 19
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-gcc][patch] Use LDFLAGS from configure
On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote: > The bootstrap was OK, but I am getting the following error trying to > commit: > > svn: Commit failed (details follow): > svn: MKACTIVITY of > '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/05b8ac29-8fd9-4f8e-9c3c-d39e89ade19f': 400 > Bad Request (http://llvm.org) > > Any idea what could be wrong? Nope, not really... but google found: http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=152&t=123806 for me. Another post suggests using https instead of http. Any yet another suggests antivirus software can muc...