Hello, Gary> I'm getting a weird error if I run llc on the attached module. > Did I do something wrong (llc says the module is broken, also > attached) or is this a bug?This is clear indication, that module was constructed improperly: there is some possible path in CFG, where result of instruction can be used before actual definition. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
Anton Korobeynikov wrote:> > I'm getting a weird error if I run llc on the attached module. > > Did I do something wrong (llc says the module is broken, also > > attached) or is this a bug? > > This is clear indication, that module was constructed improperly: > there is some possible path in CFG, where result of instruction > can be used before actual definition.Ah, I found it, it's totally my error. Thanks! Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] Instruction does not dominate all uses
- [LLVMdev] PowerPC instruction cache invalidation
- [LLVMdev] Implementing llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC
- [LLVMdev] PowerPC instruction cache invalidation
- [LLVMdev] Implementing llvm.atomic.cmp.swap.i32 on PowerPC