Duncan Sands
2008-Apr-07 17:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
> > 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test results emailed > > to the llvm-testresults. > > Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part of the > llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the > scripts.Probably means the gcc testsuite. Ciao, Duncan.
Devang Patel
2008-Apr-07 17:58 UTC
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
On Apr 7, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:>>> 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test >>> results emailed >>> to the llvm-testresults. >> >> Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part >> of the >> llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the >> scripts. > > Probably means the gcc testsuite.Eventually, we want to to move all lang. FE tests from llvm/test to llvm-gcc testsuite once nightly tester script start supporting llvm- gcc-4.2 builds. - Devang
Tanya M. Lattner
2008-Apr-07 18:37 UTC
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
>>> 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test results emailed >>> to the llvm-testresults. >> >> Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part of the >> llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the >> scripts. > > Probably means the gcc testsuite.Well then this should be clarified in the proposal. :) -Tanya> > Ciao, > > Duncan. >
Rajika Kumarasiri
2008-Apr-07 19:41 UTC
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
Thanks all for your ideas, Please review the proposal at Google web app. I have added my proposal there. Thanks! -Rajika On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote:> > >>> 4. Running Fortran, Ada, C/C++/ObjC tests as well with test results > emailed > >>> to the llvm-testresults. > >> > >> Are these different or new tests? Why wouldn't they just be a part of > the > >> llvm-test module? Then you don't have to do any modifications to the > >> scripts. > > > > Probably means the gcc testsuite. > > Well then this should be clarified in the proposal. :) > > -Tanya > > > > > Ciao, > > > > Duncan. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-- comp.lang.c - http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/topics -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080408/d2b18b2a/attachment.html>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
- [LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
- [LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
- [LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] Grawp-PIC i386 nightly tester results