search for: objc

...stage1/ -B/home/michael/software/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iobjc -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/objc -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include ../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c -o objc/objc-act.o ../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c: In function ‘objc_init’: ../../gcc/objc/objc-act.c:714: warning: empty body in an if-statement...

...t that patch in before 2.4 is release? Jack ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that I get a series of warning messages... f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option...

...ct.o java/jcf-io.o java/win32-host.o java/jcf-parse.o java/mangle.o java/mangle_name.o java/builtins.o java/ resource.o java/jcf-write.o java/buffer.o java/check-init.o java/jcf- depend.o java/jcf-path.o java/boehm.o java/java-gimplify.o main.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a attribs.o stub-objc.o stub-c.o -L../ zlib -lz ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../ libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a /home/kchan/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/prev- gcc/xgcc -B/home/kchan/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/host-x86_64-unknown- linux-gnu/prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linu...

...S stats/ols.mak RXP rxp/rxp.mak LINUX16_AUDIO config/modules/linux16_audio.mak Making in directory ./siod ... making dependencies -- siodeditline.c cc1: warning: "-Wno-non-template-friend" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC cc1: warning: "-Wno-deprecated" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC el_complete.c cc1: warning: "-Wno-non-template-friend" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC cc1: warning: "-Wno-deprecated" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC editline.c cc1: warning: "-Wno-non-t...

...e? I applied it to mainline. > ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm > svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that > I get a series of warning messages... > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: comma...

...> > > ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm > > svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that > > I get a series of warning messages... > > > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > > f951:...

...ummary > > Status Group # # (B) > Performance Regressions 45 46 > Unchanged Tests 849 848 > *Total Tests* *894* *894* > > > Run-Over-Run Changes Detail > > Performance Regressions - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ Δ (B) σ (B) > SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4 > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.420=3> 7.94% 0.3463 > 0.3738 0.0002 7.88% 0.0002 > SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.222=3> 7.88% 0.3437 > 0.3708 0.0003 7.73% 0.00...

...) >> Performance Regressions 45 46 >> Unchanged Tests 849 848 >> *Total Tests* *894* *894* >> >> >> Run-Over-Run Changes Detail >> >> Performance Regressions - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ Δ (B) σ (B) >> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4 >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.420=3> 7.94% 0.3463 >> 0.3738 0.0002 7.88% 0.0002 >> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.222=3> 7.88% 0.3437 >> 0.37...

...ions 45 46 >>> Unchanged Tests 849 848 >>> *Total Tests* *894* *894* >>> >>> >>> Run-Over-Run Changes Detail >>> >>> Performance Regressions - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ Δ (B) σ (B) >>> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4 >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.420=3> 7.94% 0.3463 >>> 0.3738 0.0002 7.88% 0.0002 >>> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.222=3> 7.88% 0.34...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I have recently started using llvm and just decided to use it one of my projects. I wonder if there is an objc frontend available? Im suddenly very tempted to put the objc runtime in kernel space! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail iD8DBQFDoSQ1yihxuQOYt8wRAjrrAJ4g5pzWnQrE1xzcA0BGY2sKaXSemwCfc9JI 7tdtKj4YeQ+qidJQFLOTtQ0= =nKFu -----END...

...not really be functional since gfortran is being given this formatting flags by default. I think this may not be obvious for the other compilers since they don't complain if these flags are present like gfortran does... f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran f951: warning: command line option...

...PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm > svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that > I get a series of warning messages... > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ > ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for > C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid > for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951:...

...>> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm >> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that >> I get a series of warning messages... >> >> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ >> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran >> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for >> C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran >> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid >> for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran...

> So no JIT for i386? I didn't realise i386 still used ObjC 1 - all my experiments were on arm64. i386 support for ObjC would be nice to have, but it's not a blocker for adding ObjC 2 support. - Lang. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Stanislav Pankevic...

...nged Tests 849 848 >>>> *Total Tests* *894* *894* >>>> >>>> >>>> Run-Over-Run Changes Detail >>>> >>>> Performance Regressions - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ Δ (B) σ (B) >>>> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/exceptions-4 >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.420=3> 7.94% 0.3463 >>>> 0.3738 0.0002 7.88% 0.0002 >>>> SingleSource/UnitTests/ObjC/trivial-interface >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.222=...

Is there an llvm objc frontend we can play with? If none then is there being written now? -- SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20051213/c9765598/attachment.html>

...> >> > >> > >> > On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > >> > Thank you all. I am going to try to reply to all comments in a single email. >> > >> > Regarding the .apple_objc idea, I am afraid the situation is not as >> > simple as just flipping a switch. >> > >> > >> > Jonas is currently working on adding the support for DWARF5-style Objective-C accelerator tables to LLVM/LLDB/dsymutil. Based on the assumption that DWARF 4 and earlie...

..., at 9:36 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Thank you all. I am going to try to reply to all comments in a single email. > > Regarding the .apple_objc idea, I am afraid the situation is not as > simple as just flipping a switch. > > > Jonas is currently working on adding the support for DWARF5-style Objective-C accelerator tables to LLVM/LLDB/dsymutil. Based on the assumption that DWARF 4 and earlier are unaffected by any of this, I d...

...or q <return> to quit--- statePtr = <value optimized out> channelName = "\020\330\377\277;\003\340\267\364/\351\267\310K\351\267x~\033\b8\330\377\277\004\003\340\267\240c\005\b\210\a\374\b\020M", <incomplete sequence \351\267> #10 0xb7e11664 in Tcl_SocketObjCmd (notUsed=0x0, interp=0x80563a0, objc=4, objv=0x81b7e74) at /build/buildd/tcl8.5-8.5.7/unix/../generic/tclIOCmd.c:1564 socketOptions = {0xb7e73c6e "-async", 0xb7e73c75 "-myaddr", 0xb7e73c7d "-myport", 0xb7e73c85 "-server", 0x0}...

Hi Stanislav, Sorry -- I am not much help here. I would like to get ObjC runtime support for the JIT, but have not had time to look in to it closely. When I last tested the idea (a couple of years ago now) we used selector registration and objc_readClassPair to get basic test cases working as you have, but ran into (possibly similar) failures on non-trivial test cases....