search for: improving

Hello, I am having trouble with creating a simple bar chart using R. My file just consists of 1 column called reason. Within this column, there are 2 responses(Room for Improvement and Info entered is all relevant). My code for creating the charts is as follows: d <-read.table("C://project/graphs/reason.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE) pie(d$reason, labels=d$reason,

Hi, Im having trouble creating the following graph. Here is my code: library(plotrix) library(prettyR) female_improvement <-read.table("C://project/graphs/gender/breakdown/gender-improvement/female-improvement.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE) barp(rbind(rep(length(female_improvement$gender),2),freq(female_improvement$reason)[[1]]), ylab="22 Males participated in the

The search on this forum should improve to improve the forum -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:00:01 -0500, <theora-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:26:18 +0200 > From: Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> > Subject: [theora] NHW codec - improvement of precision > To: theora at xiph.org > Message-ID: > <CAKE58qHqSsrgJP4OX++eetMmT2WTv=8ZvfXoou7bWjOnbUSrAQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type:

Hi all, I apologies in advance if I am missing something very simple here, but since I failed at resolving this myself, I'm sending this question to the list. I would appreciate any help in understanding how the rpart function is (exactly) computing the "improve" (which is given in fit$split), and how it differs when using the split='information' vs split='gini'

...ence is in the mid end, but it is still surprising to me that an improved shrink wrap will break that many tools, considering the fact that gcc has a good shrink wrapping pass and shrink-wrap-separate pass. Also, if possible, would you be able to share some performance numbers you get back then by improving shrink-wrap? Thanks, Jimmy -----Original Message----- From: Francis Visoiu Mistrih [mailto:francisvm at yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:30 PM To: Jimmy Zhongduo Lin <jimmy.zhongduo.lin at huawei.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC] Shrink-wrapping impr...

...], [2] and [3] for this). I am trying to understand the LLVM’s Attributor framework. I am interested in these 3 aspects: 1. How Attributor can help for standard inter-procedural and intra-procedural analysis passes of LLVm. I’ve seen the tutorial [4]. I would like to discuss ways of improving other optimization passes similarly (or some examples which have already been implemented). 2. Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety (dis)provers. For example, can we improve the u...

Hi, When I look at the summary of an rpart object run on my data, I get 7 nodes but when I plot the rpart object, I get only 3 nodes. Should the number of nodes not match in the results of the 2 functions (summary and plot) or it is not always the same? Look forward to your reply, Carol -------------------------------------------- ?summary(rpart.res) Call: rpart(formula = mydata$class ~ ., data

There's an entry in the changelog: "Improved decoding efficiency of all bit depths but especially so for 24 bits (lvqcl)" A couple of comments: 1) The patch that improves encoding for all depths was proposed by Miroslav Lichvar <http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=4eab6313cd2198b5647d925bdb3847590505fa21> 2) "Performance checks" graph posted by Martijn van

Hi, Sorry for bringing back such an old thread. I am interested in the latest status of the shrink wrapping pass in LLVM. I have found some active work back in 2017 from Francis Visoiu Mistrih and Kit Barton from the following links. However, it seems that all the work suddenly stops and the improvement for the existing shrink wrapping did not make it into the trunk. Is this work abandoned?

i think you should write more program . so that you can improve you ruby skills ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "ANIKET KADAM"; 发送时间: 2012年9月2日(星期天) 晚上9:52 收件人: "rubyonrails-talk"; 主题: Re: [Rails] Which Framework will improve my Ruby Skills? can you tell me which rubygems will improve my ruby skills On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:00 PM, ANIKET KADAM

Even though wine versions get released often and the weekly newsletters seem to report progress I get the impression that wine is not really improving. Of course it happens that some applications work with newer wine versions which didn't work with older ones, but at the same time old applications stop working. Is it only me that gets the impression that wine only changes over time, but doesn't improve? Philipp

Hi Johannes. My name is Hideto Ueno. I’m interested in working on GSoC project, “Improve (function) attribute inference”. As far as I see [0] and related patches, you have already implemented algorithms for many of the deducible function attributes with the new framework “Attributor”. I doubt whether there is still room for improvement as a GSoC project. If there is, let me know. Thanks.

...rial effort. This can not/should not be the task of a single person or small group of people. Using a crowd sourced method by implementing a wiki approach to the CRAN package repository would allow for the rapid editing, sorting and improvement of this impressive and precious resource, while also improving the accessibility, visibility and quality of individual packages. It would also bind the For example, such an interface would allow the cleaning up of the repository through the use of tagging of packages, using similar approaches to the wikipedia project (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:...

Dear r-help-list: I' got a question about the computation of the improve of a split. The following is an extract of an output of the summary of a tree: Node number 1: 600 observations, complexity param=0.007272727 predicted class=0 expected loss=0.1666667 class counts: 500 100 probabilities: 0.833 0.167 left son=2 (211 obs) right son=3 (389 obs) Primary splits: x4

Hello, I am Ruijie Fang, a GSoC student working on "Improve hot cold splitting to aggressively outline small blocks." Over the course of last week, I met with my mentor and co-mentor, Aditya Kumar, and Rodrigo Rocha, and we made a preliminary plan on improving the existing hot/cold splitting pass in LLVM through identifying patterns of cold blocks in real-world workloads via block frequency information (We have settled to use the PostgreSQL codebase as a workload first, although if time permits, we will also target other large codebases). Our project wi...

Hi I want to pursue a project based to improve the existing KCoFI method which is the Control Flow integrity method for commodity os. Since KCoFI is a llvm based project I plan to undertake the project to improve the existing KCoFI method. Following are the improvements that I want to pursue: 1. To improve the call graph used in KCoFI. Implement a stronger call graph. 2. Port the KCoFI to

On 6 August 2016 at 00:18, Michael Kuperstein <mkuper at google.com> wrote: > I agree that we can get *more* improvement with better cost modeling, but > I'd expect to be able to get *some* improvement the way things are right > now. Elena said she saw "some" improvements. :) > That's why I'm curious about where we saw regressions - I'm wondering >

Hi Everyone, Here are my notes on the LLVM 1.7 release, which will go into the final release announcement. As Tanya mentioned, it has been far too long since the last release, and there have been a lot of CVS commits since Novemeber. :) I went through them all and pulled out some of the major improvements, which I've listed below. I'm certain that I have forgotten some things, so

Hi I am trying to install vim-puppet for syntax highlight of puppet manifest file. I first installed vim-puppet and then vim. Then I ran "vim-addon-manager -w install puppet" I am still unable to see the colours on site.pp bala@WheezyMaster:~$ vim-addon-manager # Name User Status System Status editexisting removed removed justify