On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:> The "make check" produced: > === Summary ==> > # of expected passes 2209 > # of unexpected failures 41 > # of expected failures 5 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' > gmake: *** [check] Error 2At Duncan's suggestion, I re-built LLVM (and llvm-gcc4, and then llvm again) with Debug+Checks and I now get: === Summary == # of expected passes 2207 # of unexpected failures 43 # of expected failures 5 gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' gmake: *** [check] Error 2 Typescript here, which looks different and trips at least one STL check that I can see: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt (old typescript here:)> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check.txt--Emil
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txtHere's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::MachineInstr>::getNext ( N=0x5a5a5a5a) at MachineBasicBlock.h:37 #1 0x0854d807 in llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>::operator-- ( this=0xbfbfe880) at ilist:137 #2 0x085502c5 in std::__advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> (__i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=0) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:145 #3 0x08550311 in std::advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> ( __i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=-1) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:177 #4 0x08550339 in llvm::prior<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr> > (it {<bidirectional_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr,int>> = {<std::iterator<std::bidirectional_iterator_tag,llvm::MachineInstr,int,llvm::MachineInstr*,llvm::MachineInstr&>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, NodePtr = 0x5a5a5a5a}) at STLExtras.h:154 #5 0x085c08c8 in LoadStoreMultipleOpti (this=0x29005ec0, MBB=@0x2904c400) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:683 #6 0x085c0a8e in runOnMachineFunction (this=0x29005ec0, Fn=@0x290282c0) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/Target/ARM/ARMLoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:744 #7 0x0853d4b8 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction (this=0x29005ec0, F=@0x29007420) at MachineFunctionPass.h:41 #8 0x08b48a5d in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction (this=0x29037060, F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1168 #9 0x08b48cc4 in llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run (this=0x2902a040, F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1126 #10 0x08b48e48 in llvm::FunctionPassManager::run (this=0xbfbfebcc, F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1071 #11 0x0851b0da in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfbfec84) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/tools/llc/llc.cpp:295 line 37 is: 37 static MachineInstr* getNext(MachineInstr* N) { return N->next; } (gdb) print N $1 = (llvm::MachineInstr *) 0x5a5a5a5a (gdb) print *N Cannot access memory at address 0x5a5a5a5a Should I take this (and the other crashes?) off the list and start filing bugs or something? --Emil
Is this the same issue as PR1686? If so, please add to it. What kind of host machine are you using? Thanks, Evan On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Emil Mikulic wrote:> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt > > Here's an ARM test that cores: > > $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19- > InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > $ gdb `which llc` llc.core > [...] > (gdb) where > #0 0x0853d606 in llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::MachineInstr>::getNext ( > N=0x5a5a5a5a) at MachineBasicBlock.h:37 > #1 0x0854d807 in > llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>::operator-- ( > this=0xbfbfe880) at ilist:137 > #2 0x085502c5 in > std::__advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> > (__i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=0) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:145 > #3 0x08550311 in > std::advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> ( > __i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=-1) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:177 > #4 0x08550339 in > llvm::prior<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr> > (it> {<bidirectional_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr,int>> = > {<std::iterator<std::bidirectional_iterator_tag,llvm::MachineInstr,int > ,llvm::MachineInstr*,llvm::MachineInstr&>> = {<No data fields>}, > <No data fields>}, NodePtr = 0x5a5a5a5a}) > at STLExtras.h:154 > #5 0x085c08c8 in LoadStoreMultipleOpti (this=0x29005ec0, > MBB=@0x2904c400) > at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/Target/ARM/ > ARMLoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:683 > #6 0x085c0a8e in runOnMachineFunction (this=0x29005ec0, > Fn=@0x290282c0) > at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/Target/ARM/ > ARMLoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:744 > #7 0x0853d4b8 in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction > (this=0x29005ec0, > F=@0x29007420) at MachineFunctionPass.h:41 > #8 0x08b48a5d in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction (this=0x29037060, > F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/ > PassManager.cpp:1168 > #9 0x08b48cc4 in llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run (this=0x2902a040, > F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/ > PassManager.cpp:1126 > #10 0x08b48e48 in llvm::FunctionPassManager::run (this=0xbfbfebcc, > F=@0x29007420) at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/lib/VMCore/ > PassManager.cpp:1071 > #11 0x0851b0da in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfbfec84) > at /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/tools/llc/llc.cpp:295 > > line 37 is: > 37 static MachineInstr* getNext(MachineInstr* N) { return N- > >next; } > > (gdb) print N > $1 = (llvm::MachineInstr *) 0x5a5a5a5a > (gdb) print *N > Cannot access memory at address 0x5a5a5a5a > > Should I take this (and the other crashes?) off the list and start > filing bugs or something? > > --Emil > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Anton Korobeynikov
2007-Sep-20 16:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Emil,> # of expected passes 2243 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 5Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is failing now. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:36:39PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:> Emil, > > > # of expected passes 2243 > > # of unexpected failures 7 > > # of expected failures 5 > > Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is > failing now.Sure: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-armfix.txt I think it's the same as my previous attempt, except without the ARM problems. --Emil
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
- [LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
- [LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
- [LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
- [LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)