search for: loopindexsplit

...>>>>>>> mayHaveSideEffects. Otherwise, looks fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some >>>>>> tests, >>>>>> i.e: >>>>>> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >>>>>> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >>>>> >>>>> isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because >>>>> it >>>>> isn't really clear what to do in...

...er than >>>>>>>> mayHaveSideEffects.  Otherwise, looks fine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some tests, >>>>>>> i.e: >>>>>>> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >>>>>>> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >>>>>> >>>>>> isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because it >>>>>> isn't really clear what to do in that c...

...gt;> I think you want isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute rather than >>>>> mayHaveSideEffects. Otherwise, looks fine. >>>> >>>> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some >>>> tests, i.e: >>>> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >>>> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >>> >>> isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because it >>> isn't really clear what to do in that case... here, it's safe, so >>> isSa...

...u want isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute rather than >>>>>> mayHaveSideEffects.  Otherwise, looks fine. >>>>> >>>>> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some tests, >>>>> i.e: >>>>> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >>>>> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >>>> >>>> isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because it >>>> isn't really clear what to do in that case... here, it's safe, so &...

Hello, This patch fixes PR4174. Two test-cases included: original one from bugzilla and a little bit complicated made be myself. It seems that LoopIndexSplit doesn't handle some cases, I'll try to send some patch this week. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4174.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3229 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/...

...cated made be myself. >>> >>> I think you want isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute rather than >>> mayHaveSideEffects. Otherwise, looks fine. >> >> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some tests, >> i.e: >> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). > > isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because it > isn't really clear what to do in that case... here, it's safe, so > isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute || isa<PHINo...

...myself. >>>> >>>> I think you want isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute rather than >>>> mayHaveSideEffects.  Otherwise, looks fine. >>> >>> With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some tests, i.e: >>> test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll >>> because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >> >> isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute returns false for PHI nodes because it >> isn't really clear what to do in that case... here, it's safe, so >> isSafeToSpeculativelyExe...

...one from >> bugzilla >> and a little bit complicated made be myself. > > I think you want isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute rather than > mayHaveSideEffects. Otherwise, looks fine. With isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute "make check" fails on some tests, i.e: test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/SaveLastValue-2007-08-17.ll because of PHI (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute == false). >> It seems that LoopIndexSplit doesn't handle some cases, I'll try to >> send >> some patch this week. > > You mean like PR3913? Or are you referring to something else? 3913 is...

Emil, > # of expected passes 2243 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 5 Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is failing now. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:36:39PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Emil, > > > # of expected passes 2243 > > # of unexpected failures 7 > > # of expected failures 5 > > Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is > failing now. Sure: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-armfix.txt I think

...ib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVNPRE.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimplifyCFG.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailRecursionElimination.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIndexSplit.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/ScalarReplAggregates.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp U lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp U l...

...p ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/Inline/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopRotate/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/dg.exp ... Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/dg.exp ... Running /home/...

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Gray < aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Anton Korobeynikov < > anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > >> >> Actually its [configure-stage3-intl] where its hanging. >> >> This can easily be due to inline FP math in the stdlib headers. For >> example - I had to

...s/JumpThreading/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LCSSA/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LoopDeletion/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LoopRotate/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/dg.exp ... Running /home/kooijman/src/llvm-trunk/test/Transfo...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

...-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/Inline/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopRotate/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/dg.exp ... Running /home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/d...