search for: mikul

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 54 matches for "mikul".

Did you mean: mikel
2007 Sep 18
1
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Sep 17, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >>>> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >>>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ >>> >>> I suspect t...
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:14:29PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> You can set the program-prefix to be "llvm-". We actually recommend >> this and its in the README.llvm. We do not require it though. > > I meant to bring this up: > > llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.s...
2007 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: Can you try it again with...
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:32:54PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/README.LLVM makes no mention of > > passing --program-prefix=llvm- to configure. > > Well, it does in trunk. I just forgot to merge it over. Thanks for > the reminder ;) > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.0/trunk/README.LL...
2007 Sep 19
4
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > The "make check" produced: > === Summary === > > # of expected passes 2209 > # of unexpected failures 41 > # of expected failures 5 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/em...
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb)...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: &...
2006 Nov 20
4
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ into LLVM bytecode: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) A simple test program, x.cpp: #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp $ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o $ lli out.bc Segmentation fault (core
2006 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > Where -is- that documented? > > The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come > up on the list. =) http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html ? ... Example with llvm-gcc4 First, create a simple C file, name it 'hello.c': #include <...
2006 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Emil Mikulic wrote: > LLVMers, given the same endianness and pointersize, can one mix and > match LLVM bytecode files produced on different platforms? No, not in general. For example, on the mac, printf it often #defined to printf$ldbl, which doesn't exist on linux. System headers generally foil...
2007 May 18
1
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf34 Stepping = 4 > Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C > MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HT...
2007 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Call for Packages
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:13:30PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Everyone. > > As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently > we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of > "packages" for different distributions. I'd like to announce that the FreeBSD ports devel/llvm and lang/llvm-gcc4 have
2006 Aug 24
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:38:36PM -0700, Scott Michel wrote: > There should also be a large notice in 40 point font and bold that says, > "gcc4 does not produce byte code by default: you must use the -emit-llvm > flag to get LLVM byte code." =) Where -is- that documented? The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come up on the list. =) (Which
2016 Sep 28
2
Possible formatting bug in ssh-agent.1 man page
.... At some > point, we should replace mdoc2man.awk with mandoc -Tman anyway. > The last time i tried, there was still some work to do, so that > won't be instantaneous. At least on Linux systems, wouldn't using man/groff's built-in mdoc support also be good enough? -- Mantas Mikul?nas <grawity at gmail.com>
2006 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout <<...
2007 Sep 13
5
[LLVMdev] Call for Packages
Hello, Everyone. As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of "packages" for different distributions. It might not be convenient to compile LLVM from source, because of broken gcc's supplied in binary packages for many distributions (for example, many Ubuntu's still
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Is this the same issue as PR1686? If so, please add to it. What kind of host machine are you using? Thanks, Evan On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt > > Here's an ARM test that cores: > > $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19- > InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -mar...
2006 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout <<...
2006 Nov 20
1
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 08:01:23AM -0800, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > > into LLVM bytecode: > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > > > #include <iostream> &gt...
2015 Aug 19
3
[Bug 2445] New: Fix gssapi-with-mic support when is set to PermitRootLogin without-password
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2445 Bug ID: 2445 Summary: Fix gssapi-with-mic support when is set to PermitRootLogin without-password Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.0p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd