search for: rmit

...ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. > > It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir != srcdir. Release, not Debug build of LLVM. http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-report.nightly.txt --Emil

...port' in llvm-test. >> >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir != srcdir. > Release, not Debug build of LLVM. > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-report.nightly.txt Thank you so much for testing the release!! I've checked out the nightly test report and it looks like there is potentially one regression. SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft...

...sses 2207 # of unexpected failures 43 # of expected failures 5 gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' gmake: *** [check] Error 2 Typescript here, which looks different and trips at least one STL check that I can see: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt (old typescript here:) > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check.txt --Emil

Emil, > # of expected passes 2243 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 5 Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is failing now. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

...orobeynikov wrote: > Emil, > > > # of expected passes 2243 > > # of unexpected failures 7 > > # of expected failures 5 > > Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is > failing now. Sure: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-armfix.txt I think it's the same as my previous attempt, except without the ARM problems. --Emil

I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ into LLVM bytecode: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) A simple test program, x.cpp: #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp $ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o $ lli out.bc Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ Oops, no go....

Hi there, Does anyone know how to predict ARMA? It doesn?t have either predict or forecast methods. I found couple of packages called fbasic and fseries at http://www.itp.phys.ethz.ch/econophysics/R/, which has ?arma.predict? in it, but it doesn?t seem to be working. Any help in this regard would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards Skanda Kallur "Prediction is very difficult,

...t; >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > > Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir != srcdir. > > Release, not Debug build of LLVM. > > > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-report.nightly.txt > > Thank you so much for testing the release!! You're welcome! > I've checked out the nightly test report and it looks like there is > potentially one regression. &g...

Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If it's available please where could I download it from? Thanks. Napi

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If > it's available please where could I download it from? I did this last year. Check out: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 --Emil

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } > > $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp > $ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o > $ lli out.bc >...

...nstalled? > > Yes. Reid has changed this so that perl is now required. > > Thanks so much for reporting these! You're welcome! I'm still working on the "method four" testing that you requested. The "make check" is done, results are here: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt Summary: Native configuration is i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 # of expected passes 1988 # of expected failures 3 -=- I'm currently stuck on the nightly report, at this point: /usr/home/emil/llvm-test/RunSafely.sh 500 0 /dev/null Output/tramp3d-v4.out-nat Out...

I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/ If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please download the appropriate tarballs from the website. Here are a few ways you can help test this release: 1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check. 2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in llvm::ilist_...

Still getting the same error. Apr 29 11:57:49 WARNING[1125329600]: chan_sip.c:503 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call 6b8b4567327b23c6643c986966334873@211.28.255.135 for seqno 102 (Critical Request) please advise anyone!!!!!someone!!! jai

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } > > $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp > $ llvmc -o=out x.o std/*.o sup/*.o > $ lli out.bc >...

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:13:30PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Everyone. > > As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently > we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of > "packages" for different distributions. I'd like to announce that the FreeBSD ports devel/llvm and lang/llvm-gcc4 have

Okay, let's try this again. I've taken all the source and header files needed to build libstdc++ and libsupc++, and put together a small and very simple Makefile that automates the process. Anyone interested can grab the whole thing from here: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 (101KB) Usage instructions: 1) Run GNU make: $ gmake This will produce dietstdcxx.bc - a bytecode / object file containing all of stdc++ and supc++ llvm-link'd together. 2) Run: $ gmake test This will build and run the test program. Example: $ gmake tes...

Hi, I am using adaptIntegrate from Cubature to do numerical integration on a double integral with a 1 x 2 vector x. Say the function is something simple to start like f(x)=x1*x2 and I wish to integrate x1 over (0,365-x2) and x2 over (0,365) f <- function(x) {(x[2])*(x[1])} # "x" is vector int1<-adaptIntegrate(f, lowerLimit = c(0, 0), upperLimit = c(365-x[2], 365)) I recieve

Hello, Everyone. As you may have already noticed, 2.1 release is "really soon". Recently we found, that LLVM is somehow hard to use for end-users due to lack of "packages" for different distributions. It might not be convenient to compile LLVM from source, because of broken gcc's supplied in binary packages for many distributions (for example, many Ubuntu's still