All, We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so please read carefully. A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up some "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this without your feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad). So, please consult the SVN Migration page, http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or inclusion. If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me know ASAP! We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days. Thanks in advance for your help, Reid.
Reed, Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:> All, > > We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion > process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so > please read carefully. > > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches > and > tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and > tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up > some > "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this without your > feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad). > > So, please consult the SVN Migration page, > http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we > have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or > inclusion. > If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me > know > ASAP! > > We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days. > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > Reid. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reid Spencer wrote:> All, > > We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion > process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so > please read carefully. > > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and > tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and > tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up some > "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this without your > feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad). > > So, please consult the SVN Migration page, > http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we > have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or inclusion. > If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me know > ASAP! > > We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days. >I believe the ROOT_VLLVM tag might be the root of the vector_llvm branch. In that case, it should probably be maintained if at all possible. Rob, can you comment? The jtc and jtcllva tags *do not* need to be maintained. They were used to keep track of a snapshot of LLVM known to compile the Linux kernel before more recent LLVM releases were known to work as well. -- John T.> Thanks in advance for your help, > > Reid. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote:> Reed, > > Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual > Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. > It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure.Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script.> > Thanks, > > --Vikram > http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ > > > On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > All, > > > > We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion > > process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so > > please read carefully. > > > > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches > > and > > tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and > > tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up > > some > > "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this without your > > feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad). > > > > So, please consult the SVN Migration page, > > http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we > > have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or > > inclusion. > > If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me > > know > > ASAP! > > > > We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > > > Reid. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Hi Reid,> A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches > and tags.It's probably a bit late in the day, but have you considered other CVS to SVN conversion tools, e.g. Tailor? http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor http://darcs.arstecnica.it/tailor/ Cheers, Ralph.
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 20:05 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:> Hi Reid, > > > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches > > and tags. > > It's probably a bit late in the day, but have you considered other CVS > to SVN conversion tools, e.g. Tailor? > > http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor > http://darcs.arstecnica.it/tailor/Yes, we looked at Tailor and found cvs2svn to be better for our needs. In particular, Tailor doesn't group cvs commits into SVN revisions well. Anton did the selection so follow up with him for details :) Thanks, Reid.> > Cheers, > > > Ralph. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev