> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Two things regarding the new subversion repository :- >> 1) Can you remove lib/CodeGen/ELF - which was a copy of the 'libelf' GNU >> library which got partially deleted. > > I just removed it from the CVS repo. > >> 2) Is there any way make the "Win32" Visual Studio 2003 a separate source >> repository, so we do not have the VS2003 code being distributed on every >> *nix platform. AND could we also have a Visual Studio 2005 release in >> parallel to the VS2003 again as a separate repository. > > What is the motivation for this? The Win32 directory doesn't have VS2003 > source code AFAIK,No just the VS2003 project and solution files and a about 30 sub directories which are not required on *nix platforms. So it would be good to have the "win32" files in a separate repository if possible. I thought this would be a convient time to do this. I would like a VS2005 release of LLVM as well as the VS2003 for completeness, as VS2003 is really old hat now. Aaron
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> What is the motivation for this? The Win32 directory doesn't have >>> VS2003 >>> source code AFAIK, >> >> No just the VS2003 project and solution files and a about 30 sub >> directories >> which are not required on *nix platforms. So it would be good to have the >> "win32" files in a separate repository if possible. I thought this would >> be >> a convient time to do this. > > We also have xcode projects. If you don't want to check them out and > update them, with svn, you can use 'svn switch' on those directories.Okay. Still think a separate repository would be a good idea. A bit of work to implement but would be a good idea as every *nix user has to implement a 'svn switch' putting the onus on them rather than on the Windows user.>> I would like a VS2005 release of LLVM as well as the VS2003 for >> completeness, as VS2003 is really old hat now. > > VS2005 will upgrade the project file.I realize that but VS2003 is really old now and it would be good to support VS2005 properly for LLVM 2.0. Aaron
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Aaron Gray wrote:>> What is the motivation for this? The Win32 directory doesn't have VS2003 >> source code AFAIK, > > No just the VS2003 project and solution files and a about 30 sub directories > which are not required on *nix platforms. So it would be good to have the > "win32" files in a separate repository if possible. I thought this would be > a convient time to do this.We also have xcode projects. If you don't want to check them out and update them, with svn, you can use 'svn switch' on those directories.> I would like a VS2005 release of LLVM as well as the VS2003 for > completeness, as VS2003 is really old hat now.VS2005 will upgrade the project file. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/