From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> Fix drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c: In function ?virtballoon_probe?: drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:963:1: warning: label ?out_del_vqs? defined but not used [-Wunused-label] 963 | out_del_vqs: | ^~ The CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION ifdeffery should enclose it too. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c index 7bfe365d9372..b6ed5f8bccb1 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) iput(vb->vb_dev_info.inode); out_kern_unmount: kern_unmount(balloon_mnt); -#endif out_del_vqs: vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); +#endif out_free_vb: kfree(vb); out: -- 2.21.0
On 10.02.20 10:33, Borislav Petkov wrote:> From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> > > Fix > > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c: In function ?virtballoon_probe?: > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:963:1: warning: label ?out_del_vqs? defined but not used [-Wunused-label] > 963 | out_del_vqs: > | ^~ > > The CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION ifdeffery should enclose it too. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > index 7bfe365d9372..b6ed5f8bccb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > iput(vb->vb_dev_info.inode); > out_kern_unmount: > kern_unmount(balloon_mnt); > -#endif > out_del_vqs: > vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > +#endif > out_free_vb: > kfree(vb); > out: >Oh, right, thanks! Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:33:28AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:> From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> > > Fix > > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c: In function ?virtballoon_probe?: > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:963:1: warning: label ?out_del_vqs? defined but not used [-Wunused-label] > 963 | out_del_vqs: > | ^~ > > The CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION ifdeffery should enclose it too. > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > index 7bfe365d9372..b6ed5f8bccb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c > @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > iput(vb->vb_dev_info.inode); > out_kern_unmount: > kern_unmount(balloon_mnt); > -#endif > out_del_vqs: > vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); > +#endifI noticed the same issue and sent an almost identical patch [1] but I kept the call to del_vqs outside of the CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION guard since it seems like that should still be called when that config is unset, as that was the case before commit 1ad6f58ea936 ("virtio_balloon: Fix memory leaks on errors in virtballoon_probe()"). Is this patch fully correct? I am not a virtio expert at all, just noticing from a brief reading of this function. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200216004039.23464-1-natechancellor at gmail.com/ Cheers, Nathan> out_free_vb: > kfree(vb); > out: > -- > 2.21.0 >
> Am 16.02.2020 um 08:46 schrieb Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor at gmail.com>: > > ?On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:33:28AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> >> >> Fix >> >> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c: In function ?virtballoon_probe?: >> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:963:1: warning: label ?out_del_vqs? defined but not used [-Wunused-label] >> 963 | out_del_vqs: >> | ^~ >> >> The CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION ifdeffery should enclose it too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> >> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c >> index 7bfe365d9372..b6ed5f8bccb1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c >> @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> iput(vb->vb_dev_info.inode); >> out_kern_unmount: >> kern_unmount(balloon_mnt); >> -#endif >> out_del_vqs: >> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev); >> +#endif > > I noticed the same issue and sent an almost identical patch [1] but I > kept the call to del_vqs outside of the CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION guard > since it seems like that should still be called when that config is > unset, as that was the case before commit 1ad6f58ea936 ("virtio_balloon: > Fix memory leaks on errors in virtballoon_probe()"). Is this patch fully > correct? I am not a virtio expert at all, just noticing from a brief > reading of this function.I think you are right and this splipped my eyes!
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix unused label warning
- [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix unused label warning
- [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Adjust label in virtballoon_probe
- [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Adjust label in virtballoon_probe
- [PATCH] virtio_balloon: Fix build error seen with CONFIG_BALLOON_COMPACTION=n