Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-Dec-30 12:25 UTC
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:> virtio-1 allow setting of the FEATURES_OK status bit to fail if > the negotiated feature bits are inconsistent: let's fail > virtio_set_status() in that case and update virtio-ccw to post an > error to the guest. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>Right but a separate validate_features call is awkward. How about we defer virtio_set_features until FEATURES_OK, and teach virtio_set_features that it can fail?> --- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c > index e09e0da..a55e851 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c > @@ -555,15 +555,19 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw) > if (!(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) { > virtio_ccw_stop_ioeventfd(dev); > } > - virtio_set_status(vdev, status); > - if (vdev->status == 0) { > - virtio_reset(vdev); > - } > - if (status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) { > - virtio_ccw_start_ioeventfd(dev); > + if (virtio_set_status(vdev, status) == 0) { > + if (vdev->status == 0) { > + virtio_reset(vdev); > + } > + if (status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) { > + virtio_ccw_start_ioeventfd(dev); > + } > + sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(status); > + ret = 0; > + } else { > + /* Trigger a command reject. */ > + ret = -ENOSYS; > } > - sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(status); > - ret = 0; > } > break; > case CCW_CMD_SET_IND: > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c > index a3dd67b..90eedd3 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c > @@ -543,15 +543,37 @@ void virtio_update_irq(VirtIODevice *vdev) > virtio_notify_vector(vdev, VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR); > } > > -void virtio_set_status(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t val) > +static int virtio_validate_features(VirtIODevice *vdev) > +{ > + VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > + > + if (k->validate_features) { > + return k->validate_features(vdev); > + } else { > + return 0; > + } > +} > + > +int virtio_set_status(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t val) > { > VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > trace_virtio_set_status(vdev, val); > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) { > + if (!(vdev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK) && > + val & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK) { > + int ret = virtio_validate_features(vdev); > + > + if (ret) { > + return ret; > + } > + } > + } > if (k->set_status) { > k->set_status(vdev, val); > } > vdev->status = val; > + return 0; > } > > bool target_words_bigendian(void); > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > index a24e403..068211e 100644 > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ typedef struct VirtioDeviceClass { > uint64_t (*get_features)(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t requested_features); > uint64_t (*bad_features)(VirtIODevice *vdev); > void (*set_features)(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t val); > + int (*validate_features)(VirtIODevice *vdev); > void (*get_config)(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config); > void (*set_config)(VirtIODevice *vdev, const uint8_t *config); > void (*reset)(VirtIODevice *vdev); > @@ -233,7 +234,7 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align); > void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n); > void virtio_queue_set_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, uint16_t vector); > -void virtio_set_status(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t val); > +int virtio_set_status(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t val); > void virtio_reset(void *opaque); > void virtio_update_irq(VirtIODevice *vdev); > int virtio_set_features(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint64_t val); > -- > 1.7.9.5
Cornelia Huck
2015-Jan-07 16:13 UTC
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:25:37 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > virtio-1 allow setting of the FEATURES_OK status bit to fail if > > the negotiated feature bits are inconsistent: let's fail > > virtio_set_status() in that case and update virtio-ccw to post an > > error to the guest. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > > Right but a separate validate_features call is awkward. > How about we defer virtio_set_features until FEATURES_OK, > and teach virtio_set_features that it can fail?Hm. But we would need to keep virtio_set_features() where it is called now for legacy devices, as they will never see FEATURES_OK, right? So we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether this makes the code easier to follow.
Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-Jan-07 19:08 UTC
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:13:32PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:25:37 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > virtio-1 allow setting of the FEATURES_OK status bit to fail if > > > the negotiated feature bits are inconsistent: let's fail > > > virtio_set_status() in that case and update virtio-ccw to post an > > > error to the guest. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > > > > Right but a separate validate_features call is awkward. > > How about we defer virtio_set_features until FEATURES_OK, > > and teach virtio_set_features that it can fail? > > Hm. But we would need to keep virtio_set_features() where it is called > now for legacy devices, as they will never see FEATURES_OK, right? > So > we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent > is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether > this makes the code easier to follow.So let's make this a separate callback then. virtio_legacy_set_features?
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
- [PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
- [PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
- [PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
- [PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status