LARTC - Oct 2004 - limited upload speed

HI all,
  
   What is best way to be limited upload speed from LAN users. I read
that it is possible to be done with IMQ interface or with limitation
over gateway interface of router(eth0 in  my "scheme"), but i cannot
chose what is preferred way and need from advice.

Please for advise, any example scripts or URL with tutorial are welcome :)
 I read couple times Linux Traffic Control.

                                      -----------------------------
      Internet ISP       --------| eth0             eth1 |-------   LOCAL LAN 
                                      -----------------------------

Best regards
Emo
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

we''re doing it over the eth0.. i mean anything that comes from eth1
(upload) is shaped on eth0 when it would leave the router/shaper,
and downloads (coming in on eth0) are shaped when it gets router to
the users on eth1. Both are using HTB and it works just perfectly
fine.
-diab

-
diab
et>    What is best way to be limited upload speed from LAN users. I read
et> that it is possible to be done with IMQ interface or with limitation
et> over gateway interface of router(eth0 in  my "scheme"), but i
cannot
et> chose what is preferred way and need from advice.

et> Please for advise, any example scripts or URL with tutorial are welcome
:)
et>  I read couple times Linux Traffic Control.

et>                                       -----------------------------
et>       Internet ISP       --------| eth0             eth1 |-------   LOCAL
LAN
et>                                       -----------------------------


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

If LARTC wasn''t enough or too detailed, try Wondershaper.
http://omg.wp.gg/wshaper-howto/

Stephan


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] Im
Auftrag von emo terziev
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 10:24
An: LARC
Betreff: [LARTC] limited upload speed

HI all,
  
   What is best way to be limited upload speed from LAN users. I read
that it is possible to be done with IMQ interface or with limitation
over gateway interface of router(eth0 in  my "scheme"), but i cannot
chose what is preferred way and need from advice.

Please for advise, any example scripts or URL with tutorial are welcome
:)
 I read couple times Linux Traffic Control.

                                      -----------------------------
      Internet ISP       --------| eth0             eth1 |-------
LOCAL LAN 
                                      -----------------------------

Best regards
Emo


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello All.

I''ve built some boxes for QoS that work wonderfully. Much thanks to 
everyone''s work on this project. Citrix + Videoconferencing are working
great.

Thing is, I''d really like to not rely on the old 4GB drives in these 
machines. I would like to build a kernel small enough to put on a 32 or 64 
MB flash (compressed). Fedora Core 1, minimal install + bridge-utils is 
still around 500 MB (will probably be about 1/3 that compressed).

TIA
-Ron

Why not try LEAF or Embedian? I use LEAF and it works well. Will take you a
while to get used to it as opposed to standard RH kind of distro. The LEAF
site is pretty good. I can also help you offlist, if need be. I''m also
the
maintainer of the QoS and bridging chapters on the LEAF Users Guide. 

Warm regards
Mohan 
________________________________

	From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl
[mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of rsenykoff@harrislogic.com
	Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:45 PM
	To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
	Subject: [LARTC] small kernel distro recommendations for QoS box
	
	

	Hello All. 
	
	I''ve built some boxes for QoS that work wonderfully. Much thanks to
everyone''s work on this project. Citrix + Videoconferencing are working
great. 
	
	Thing is, I''d really like to not rely on the old 4GB drives in these
machines. I would like to build a kernel small enough to put on a 32 or 64
MB flash (compressed). Fedora Core 1, minimal install + bridge-utils is
still around 500 MB (will probably be about 1/3 that compressed). 
	
	TIA 
	-Ron 
	
	


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

<snip>
Why not try LEAF or Embedian? I use LEAF and it works well. Will take you 
a
while to get used to it as opposed to standard RH kind of distro. The LEAF
site is pretty good. I can also help you offlist, if need be. I''m also
the
maintainer of the QoS and bridging chapters on the LEAF Users Guide. 

Warm regards
Mohan
</snip>

LEAF http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ looks to be a great option. Is the 
Bering fork where I should be looking (2.4 kernel)? I''m not really 
interested in the Shorewall functionality of it. Feel free to contact me 
personally as we''re now getting off-topic for this forum.

Thanks!
-Ron