search for: videoconferencing

Hello everybody, i am searching a solution for a videoconferencing, Any solution (Free/commercial). Asterisk is a great software, but recently we have more and more demands about videoconferencing of 3 or more peoples, Existing solutions are heavy and costly, around 2500? for 1 client. This is insane. Is there any solutions out there for non millionaires ? Or even...

Hi Ulrich, <p>you distroyed my evening today ;-). Im only sitting here and follow the videoconferencing thread ;-)). > due to the ongoing discussion on both lists, i simply respond to both > lists. it's hard crossposting, but it's for both roups relevant (i > think). Yes, this was right. There is a great discussion and perhaps we got some points more yet. > +After having thoug...

> to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++ > component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode > 100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and decoding is cheap), but that's all

Hi Jean-Marc, <p>>>to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++ >>component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode >>100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME > At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible > to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and

...good audio settings are Speex narrowband, high quality is HawkVoice and toll quality is PCM. -----Original Message----- From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Breuer Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:42 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [speex-dev] Videoconferencing with speex and jabber Hi all, <p>i have send a mail to the jabber mailing list and ask them how to send speex data with the jabber instant messaging protocol. I have added the mail adter this one. If someone here has any experience with jabber and speex please let me know. Thanks, <p&...

Hi Carsten, due to the ongoing discussion on both lists, i simply respond to both lists. it's hard crossposting, but it's for both roups relevant (i think). <p>+After having thought about control structures, it makes sense to me to do the extra work and merge this creamed cake into a jabber server component. Otherwise a control channel to the server component would have to be

I would like to participate also. Tony T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.K. Lin" <jk@pageshare.com> To: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [speex-dev] Videoconferencing with speex and jabber <p>> Me, me, me, me too. > I would love to use it if there is one ;-) > (I wish I can contribute more, but Windows is not my expertise :-( ) > > -- jk > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner...

...ore, but Windows is not my expertise :-( ) -- jk <p>> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]On > Behalf Of Carsten Breuer > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:22 PM > To: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [speex-dev] Videoconferencing with speex and jabber > > > Hi Allen, > > > Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are > > currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, > > multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. > > I have v...

Hello, Has anyone used Polycom's VSX line of videoconferencing equipment with Asterisk? It seems some of their models, namely the newer VSX 5000, supports SIP. -- The Internet used to be a lot of smart people sitting at dumb terminals, but now its a lot of dumb people sitting at smart terminals!

Does anyone have any experience with this? We're looking to deploy a pretty robust HiDef Video Conferencing solution, and if it were built around Asterisk, that'd be a huge bonus. It looks like a bounty was offered on it for a while with no results, and now an Indian company - Adiance - claims to have a solution, but I can't find any real feedback on it from end users. What do

...===================================================== Hi all, im new on this list, so i want to introduce myself. I'm a software developer working for a big car company in germany (the fast ones) and i am part of the engine control team. Topic: This mail contains some questions how to support videoconferencing with the jabber protocol. Why i doing this: My mother live in california and i want to make videoconferences with her. She use WinXP and is never even thinking off to change to linux. My newest Windows is 98 and Microsoft doesn't support Videoconferencing between 98 and XP anymore. I was neve...

Hi Allen, > Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are > currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, > multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. I have visit your website and the solution looks interesting for big entities. Of course it is comercial, so it's not in my scope. I'm taregeting smal entities. Some

> First i want to say that libspeex produce defently too much > errors. I think it was written by a mathematician, right ;-)). No, it was written by an electrical engineering Ph.D. student (i.e. me). Note that if you are that concerned with warnings (and code quality I hope), perhaps the best thing to do is start using *stable* versions. If you use a stable version (1.0.2, but I'll

Hello Jean-Marc, Regarding your question - a little background on the various choices, Fair Quality is 15kbps Speex narrowband, Good Quality is 24kbps Speex narrowband, High Quality is 32kbps ADPCM from HawkVoice and Toll Quality is 64kbps PCM. We also have 10 other codecs within the product including GSM, LPC and others that we currently do not expose. To us, quality is a combination of

Hi all, <p>im new on the list and want to introduce my self. Im a software developer working on engine control software for a german car manufacturer. I want to use speex for a privat videoconferencing project and faces some problems with it. First of all the projects in Visual-C++ doesn't work. I don't mean the path an dependecy problems. That is easy. But there are some errors. First i want to say that libspeex produce defently too much errors. I think it was written by a mathematicia...

Le mar 18/11/2003 à 17:39, Allen Drennan a écrit : > Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are > currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, > multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. > > http://www.wiredred.com/downloads/ecsetup.exe > > The fair and good audio settings are Speex narrowband, high quality

Greetings all, I'm playing with asterisk and two Polycom VSX300 videoconferencing units. And I'm having zero luck getting video working over SIP. The two units register fine with asterisk, and with "allow=all" in sip.conf, the two units establish voice. But no video. And no obvious messages as to whats going wrong. The config for each is (they're numbere...

What would your wish list be for a handheld theora video camera? 640x480 25fps/30fps 320x240 25fps/30fps Record to a memory card (SD) Lan / WIFI support (auto/manual upload of file on memory card) Live streaming (icecast like) Videoconferencing support Voip (sip) speex audio I am bouncing the idea around of developing a handheld video camera designed for mobile video streaming Win a MacBook Air or iPod touch with Yahoo!7. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset

Hi, Anyone here managed to run Jitsi Meet on a CentOS 7 server ? As far as I can tell, it's one of the nicer open source videoconferencing solutions out there. I gave it a spin on https://suricate.tv and now I'd like to install it on one of my servers. Unfortunately the Jitsi developers only provide documentation for Debian/Ubuntu. Well, there is some sort of guide for CentOS around. As far as I can tell, the purpose of this guid...

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Pablo Baena <pbaena at gmail.com> wrote: > html 5 doesn't support live video AFAIK. Interesting. I use it on a regular basis... it's how we're doing videoconferencing in RedHat right now. Is FF just going above and beyond? Monty