pljosh
2004-Jun-21 16:18 UTC
IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....
Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as it was in previous relases. Are there some side-effects or something that this patch wasent applied to "official" imq? -josh _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Andre Correa
2004-Jun-23 00:55 UTC
Re: IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....
In fact we''ve being discussing lately at linuximq.net mailling list
this
subject and what would be the best way to enable this "behavior"
change
"automatically".
There is no problem on changing where IMQ hooks, after or before NAT for
example, not that we found until now.
The matter is what should be done to enable the selection of behaviors
without needing to apply a patch or change the code itself. For IMQ as
module I''ve thought about passing a parameter, but if it is compiled in
the kernel what could be the way? Something in the /proc???
It should be possible to select from 4 diferent situations:
PREROUTING POSTROUTING
-------------------------------------
1 IMQ after NAT IMQ after NAT
2 IMQ before NAT IMQ after NAT
3 IMQ after NAT IMQ before NAT
4 IMQ before NAT IMQ before NAT
Any ideas are welcome.
tks
Andre
pljosh wrote:> Hello there!
> I was reading this archive:
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
>
> It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ
> with nat in PREROUTING chain...
>
> From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for
2.4.26 and
> what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as
> it was in previous relases.
>
> Are there some side-effects or something that this patch wasent applied
> to "official" imq?
>
> -josh
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/