search for: linuximq

Hi Guys, I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9 and I want to know is this procedure is correct: ---------------------------------------- - In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux) # cd /usr/src/linux # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff # patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff - In Patch O Matic Directory (/usr/local/src/Patch-o-Matic) # cd /usr/local/src/Patch-o-Matic # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/pom-20030625.diff # patch -p1 < pom-20030625.diff - In IP Tables 1.2.9 Directory...

I''ve followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a couple of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was his name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in my test environment. I now need to implement it in my production environment. My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection to the

Hello, Some time ago I''ve read somewhere that local traffic in IMQ could hung up the whole system but it was corrected long time ago. So I was very surprised yesterday when it occurred not true. While testing IMQ I''ve observed for some time that - if you tag some local traffic with iptables both in pre- and postrouting - kernel is hunging up. It is happening quite quick with

Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as it was in previous relases. Are there some side-effects or something that this patch wasent applied to "official" imq? -josh ________________________...

I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with iptables 1.3.3. I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When I enter the line iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1 (eth1 is the external interface), the computer slows to a crawl. OK, the CPU is only an AMD K6 233 which is not the world''s greatest CPU, but egress shaping is done at acceptable speed. Neit...

Hi there, -- Christian Lyra PoP-PR/RNP _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have a linux box with kernel 2.4.22 and iptables 1.2.9 First, i patch linux kernel with Norbet Buckmuller''s .diff #cd \usr\src\linux #patch -p1 < imq-combo-debian-2.4.22.diff All correct Second, i -try to- patch iptables (following www.linuximq.net/faq.html) #cd /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter I edit IMQ.pom-ng.patch and replace $KERNEL_DIR with /usr/src/linux #patch -p1 < IMQ.pom-ng.patch #cd /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/extensions #chmod +x .IMQ-test*. #cd /usr/src/linux #make dep & make modules ......

Thanks for the very prompt reply. I''ve been googling already for a few days now trying to understand how bandwidth management works. I came to understand that TC is a utility that I can use to shape up my local network bandwidth consumption. Im hoping I will be guided here through. Here are my questions: 1. Is TC works on an interface of a physical device only? 2. My objective is to

...---------------------------------------------------------- Andre D. Correa, CISSP | Visite meus projetos pessoais: andre.correa (at) pobox.com | Visit my personal projects: http://andre.hiperlinks.com.br | -http://malware.hiperlinks.com.br Sao Paulo / SP / Brazil | -http://www.linuximq.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hello there, Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ? I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple bandwidth limmiting, and it works. I''ve read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but couldn''t make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for ingress policing ... Thanks in advance. Have a nice day. -- Radu Cugut mobile: +40 742 045686 web: http://rcugut.has.it

On my debian woody (kernel 2.4.31) the tcpdump doesn''t work with imq0 devices. If I try to tcpdump imq devices there is no packet seen: [...] rt1:~# tcpdump -n -i imq0 Warning: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: WARNING: imq0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on

I''m looking for a way to shape all traffic on a virtual vlan interface, say eth1.100 to a max of 100mbit. The box is a quagga router with eth0 on the inside and vlan interfaces on the eth1 card to our upstream partners. Each partner has his own vlan on eth1. I tried shaping but was only able to shape outbound traffic on the eth1.100 interface. Inbound shaping was also possible, but

...e that: "By default IMQ in PREROUTING comes before nat and in POSTROUTING after nat, so in both cases IMQ knows ip addresses as masqueraded (nated) if it is used. This could be changed with kernel parameters IMQ_BEHAVIOR_??". My opinion is based on IMQ patch by Patrick McHardy from www.linuximq.net. Best regards, Jarek Poplawski

Hi there, I''m trying to contact imq maintainers but there is no contact address in www.linuximq.net. There is only a yahoo group but I don''t have a yahoo account and it seems it doesn''t like me a lot (it refused to create a new account). Anyone knows an email address for any IMQ developer? Its about an IMQ patch submission. <<V13>> ________________________...

Hello I''m trying the excelent IMQ patch for iptbles and kernel 2.4.21 and works very well... but, there is a IMQ patch for 2.4.24 ? I''ve tested IMQ for kernels > 2,4,21 but patch fails ! Best regards andres _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit burst 30k prio 1 and I tri...

i''m trying to limit upload and download but something is wrong(it is about NAT) i will post here my "script" maybe someone could tell me what is wrong my kernel(2.6.9) is patch with imq(linuximq.net) and my iptables(1.2.11) also #flush tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc del dev imq0 root tc qdisc del dev imq1 root ifconfig imq0 down ifconfig imq1 down iptables -t mangle -F #UPLOAD ifconfig imq0 up tc qdisc del dev imq0 root tc qdisc add dev im...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guys Ive got an internet cafe on which I have a debian sarge box running. The Debian box acts as a gateway and it has masquerading on. I have 40 client PC and i do not want to assign more than 64k per pc for upload and the same is true for download too. Ive done alot of research and Ive read tutorials about CBQ and HTB. I found that CBQ.init is

Hi All Is it possible to add the l7 patch http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ to the Xen Kernel Tree. I want to make sure this will not cause any problems with the system. I also wonder if http://www.linuximq.net/ kernel patch is also compatible. If someone can advise this it will be great Thanks Sassy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users