Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "2002q3".
Did you mean:
20023
2006 Sep 14
2
HTB and per-connection bandwidth allocation
Hi
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004977.html
I have the same problem to discuss as in the above link. I want to allocate
say X MBit per individual connection regardless of the number of connection
. KIndly could anyonen suggest me how to proceed.
I have tried with SFq but is doesnot yeild my requirement..
Thanks,
Namitha.
___...
2004 Jun 21
1
IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....
Hello there!
I was reading this archive:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ
with nat in PREROUTING chain...
From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and
what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as
it was in previous relases....
2004 Apr 19
0
Re: Solution provided --- Transparent proxy in DMZ ( squid )
Harry Lachanas wrote:
> Finally got it ....
>
> Thank god that I''ve stepped over this link
>
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/005039.html
>
> Which states the reason why the www packets were not routed corectly..
>
> the ip rule syntax requires the fwmark parameter to be in hex NOT in decimal
>
> Dear Tom,
> since I''ve seen other users in the list getting frustrated about the indicated
&...
2005 Jun 02
0
CBQ throughput and efficiency question
...gt;
To: "cai" <rjcai@utt.com.cn>
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: cbq question
> On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:51, you wrote:
> > hello, stef, I saw your assertion that cbq is not working in isolated mode:
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004782.html
> > "Btw, I never could get isolated working with cbq."
> > Is this true in all linux kernel version or only some specific.
> It's a long time since I tested it, but I never could get it working. The cbq
> code has not changed much, so I think it's...
2003 Mar 24
1
IMQ
Hello
I have a server with a dsl connection on eth1 and local interface eth0.
Because of the NAT i cannot direct traffic to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain
but have to use INPUT and FORWARD. So i use rules.
iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
And now the strange thing: FORWARD traffic gets directed nicely to the IMQ,
but