Hi all. I remember someone in here was at least affiliated with the above mentioned ipp2p-project (an extension to iptables that allows to match peer-to-peer traffic). About two weeks ago I tried to contact the author of this extension via the address that is mentioned on the project website, since I wanted to send in a patch, but with no success. At least I didn''t receive a reply. Question: is the contact address that is mentioned on the project website still correct? If not, who should I contact? Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Am Monday 10 May 2004 07:23 schrieb Michael Renzmann:> I remember someone in here was at least affiliated with the above > mentioned ipp2p-project (an extension to iptables that allows to match > peer-to-peer traffic).I added (experimental) support for IPP2P recently to my Fair NAT script. However, I also found two other projects which are pretty much capable of the same thing: iptables-p2p and l7-filter (both on Sourceforge). However, I haven''t had the time for a closer look yet, so I don''t know if they are any good.> Question: is the contact address that is mentioned on the project > website still correct? If not, who should I contact?No idea - but not everyone reads his/her mail every day, so you probably should be more patient. Two weeks is not much time, especially if the author has to review a patch you wrote. I file some bug reports here and there (which should be read by more than one person only) and even there it sometimes takes months until I get a reply. Andreas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi Andreas. Andreas Klauer wrote:> However, I also found two other projects which are pretty much capable of > the same thing: iptables-p2p and l7-filter (both on Sourceforge). However, > I haven''t had the time for a closer look yet, so I don''t know if they are > any good.I also found them before choosing ipp2p. But l7-filter is for kernel 2.6 only, and iptables-p2p seemed to be idle. So I decided to use ipp2p.>>Question: is the contact address that is mentioned on the project >>website still correct? If not, who should I contact? > No idea - but not everyone reads his/her mail every day, so you probably > should be more patient. Two weeks is not much time, especially if the > author has to review a patch you wrote. I file some bug reports here and > there (which should be read by more than one person only) and even there > it sometimes takes months until I get a reply.I know that people might be quite busy - I have the same problem. I was just wondering if I took the wrong e-mail address, since answers to questions regarding ipp2p here on the list have been answered very quickly as far as I remember. Well, didn''t meant to cause any trouble - just been curious. :) Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/