I don't think -- from what I've been able to discern -- that your
scenario below will work, starting with "once you've done that".
My own attempts to get something going in this regard stopped even
earlier, as I as attempting not to use a winamp source but a
server-based playlist. Shoutcast folks were apparently moving to Y2
support and their side was seriously broken at the time.
It took a lot of trial and error to get the shoutcast machine set up.
Finally, this configuration worked.
portbase srcip destip serverport_1 serverip_1
8080 (no spec) (no spec) 8080 localhost
My strategy was as follows:
1. Try to get listed on shoutcast with a fixed playlist on the server. I
haven't solved this yet, but should probably try again.
2. See if your theory that it is possible to relay an icecast stream
through shoutcast and be correctly listed. I have a humch this may not work.
3. If not, then run the icecast server and shoutcast servers in
parallel. Since my station at http://www.AirProgressive.org uses an
extensive perl script to "get_next" track to play, this will likely
need
to be recoded slightly to become a wrapper around a call to a program
that can be called by Shoutcast and will generate the same track.
I wonder if anyone has actually tried relaying a stream through
shoutcast AND getting it listed. It would save me a lot of time if we
can settle whether this actually works or not.
--Ray
On 3/1/2012 7:48 AM, Leo Currie wrote:> I think the message is pretty clear: The Shoutcast directory only
> lists Shoutcast servers.
>
> However, it would seem logical that if a Shoutcast server was setup to
> relay an Icecast server (i.e. the Shoutcast source is an Icecast
> server) then it would still be listed in the Shoutcast directory as
> normal.
> I would assume that the goal of this kind of setup would be to gain a
> wider audience.
> However, it should be understood that any listeners arriving from the
> Shoutcast directory would connect to the Shoutcast server, not the
> Icecast server.
>
> I've never tried this, but assuming you have a working Icecast server,
> I imagine the steps to getting the Shoutcast relay working would be:
> 1) Setup a Shoutcast server
> 2) Setup the default Shoutcast source client (Winamp?)
> 3) Test that the server works with a Shoutcast listener client (Winamp
> again!)
> 4) Test that the server is then being listed in the public Shoutcast
> directory
>
> Once you've done that, then you could switch over and use Icecast as a
> source:
> 5) Configure Icecast to provide the correct content when Shoutcast
> requests a stream (that's the <alias> directive stuff)
> 6) Reconfigure Shoutcast to relay Icecast
> 7) Repeat step 3 & 4.
>
> I'm not sure if others agree, but 'on-topic' for this list
would just
> be step (5) above.
> The rest of the steps would probably be better answered on the
> Shoutcast forums, but you might find others on this list with more
> experience who can add something.
>
> Leo
>
>
> On 29 February 2012 16:48, Romain Beauxis <toots at rastageeks.org
> <mailto:toots at rastageeks.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> 2012/2/29 Tom Swirly <tom at swirly.com <mailto:tom at
swirly.com>>:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Raymond Lutz
> <raylutz at cognisys.com <mailto:raylutz at cognisys.com>>
wrote:
> >>
> >> This is absolutely not "off-topic" and if this list
will not
> support this
> >> VERY IMPORTANT discussion, then I will be happy to host the
> discussion on a
> >> different list for those who are interested. I have been
trying
> to solve
> >> this for some time. Much of the problem so far has been
> Shoutcast internal
> >> problems (on their site) which I assume are cleared up now. My
> current
> >> assumption is it will be necessary to establish a second
> shoutcast server
> >> just to get in their directory.
> >
> >
> > Generally this list has been extremely accepting of sincere
> questions
> > relating to internet radio!
> >
> > My theory is simply that no one knows the answer, not that
> people are
> > believing the question is off-topic.
>
> I do not believe that this is off-topic at all. However, I personally
> do not wish to support shoutcast YP technology, even though I
> understand the importance of being listed there.
>
> Romain
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast mailing list
> Icecast at xiph.org <mailto:Icecast at xiph.org>
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icecast mailing list
> Icecast at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20120301/079ab2c2/attachment.htm