Oliver Hoffmann
2010-Mar-24 23:58 UTC
[Gluster-users] Concerned about glusterfs performance
Hi all, I read the posting from Jeremy and did some tar tests myself. The hardware of my test servers is rather old. Two Dell 2550 which have an internal network via crosslink (100Mbit) for the glusterfs communication. I'll change to the other NIC (1Gbit) and run the test again tomorrow. The results were pretty disappointing. I tar-ed the kernel sources which is around 80 MB. The resulting tar file had 11 MB. Unpacking this on ext4 lasted a few seconds while on my glusterfs-Raid 1 it took more than 8 minutes! Then I took the config of Jeremy and got around 5 minutes for unpacking it. Even if I have new and fast servers with 1Gbit or better 10Gbit ethernet for glusterfs I fear that the performance is still too poor. At least if it comes to reading/writing lots of tiny files from lots of clients. Mail- or db-servers come to mind. What do you think? Regards, Oliver
Oliver Hoffmann
2010-Mar-25 15:55 UTC
[Gluster-users] Concerned about glusterfs performance
Hi, I switched eth1 and eth0. Now the internal communication has 1Gbit. I ran the test again and now it took 3:30 instead of 8:something. Quite better but still not good though. Next I'll put the whole setup on recent HW. Oliver> Hi all, > > I read the posting from Jeremy and did some tar tests myself. The > hardware of my test servers is rather old. Two Dell 2550 which have > an internal network via crosslink (100Mbit) for the glusterfs > communication. I'll change to the other NIC (1Gbit) and run the test > again tomorrow. > The results were pretty disappointing. I tar-ed the kernel sources > which is around 80 MB. The resulting tar file had 11 MB. Unpacking > this on ext4 lasted a few seconds while on my glusterfs-Raid 1 it > took more than 8 minutes! Then I took the config of Jeremy and got > around 5 minutes for unpacking it. > Even if I have new and fast servers with 1Gbit or better 10Gbit > ethernet for glusterfs I fear that the performance is still too poor. > At least if it comes to reading/writing lots of tiny files from lots > of clients. Mail- or db-servers come to mind. > What do you think? > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >