Greetings, I'll keep this as brief as possible: Is Redhat going to support ext3 or reiser (or both) in the next version of Redhat (I'm not looking for a commitment, just a roadmap)? I noticed (and used) the reiser utilities in the Wolverine beta (on a test box) to make reiser paritions, but upgrading to the 7.1 release failed as it only saw ext2 partitions. I understand that ext3 is backward-compatable with ext2 (but I'm still not sure if such an upgrade would have worked). We're very interested in journaling under Linux, but are wary of using reiser now if upgrading won't be possible. Should I be using the ext3 stuff instead? Which way should we proceed? PS: Thanks for a great product! -- Larry Dillon -- Assistant Systems Manager -- Computers Unlimited (c) 2001 Assistant Web Administrator -- Internet Montana
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 03:54:22PM -0600, ldillon@cu.net wrote:> Is Redhat going to support ext3 or reiser (or both) in the next version > of Redhat (I'm not looking for a commitment, just a roadmap)?I've been hearing great things about the xfs-linux 1.0 release.... (Still think ext3 is an important and good thing, though!) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Availability of unsupported kernel for 4.2 or compiling reiser into 4.2 kernel
- Ext3 vs. Reiser?
- Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamp handling?
- Possible bug with multiport?
- Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamp handling ?