dtrace discuss - Feb 2007 - ? has mib:::udp[In/Out]Datagrams been superceded by mib:::udpHC[In/Out]Datagrams

Hi,

Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that 
mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by 
mib:::udpHCInDatagrams?

 From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m asking 
in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to 
udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite.

- Fintan

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:56:46PM +0000, Fintan Ryan wrote:
> Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that 
> mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by 
> mib:::udpHCInDatagrams?
> 
> From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m
asking
> in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to 
> udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite.
6513018 tst.udp. needs updating

regards,
john

Hi Fintan,
>
> Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that 
> mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by 
> mib:::udpHCInDatagrams?
>
> From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m
asking
> in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to 
> udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite.
Just regarding the test suite failure - this is covered by
CR 6513018 (tst.udp. needs updating). In that CR there
is a reference to CR 6501024 (Add support for new
IP/TCP/UDP MIBs) which, by the look of it, changed the
counter names.

Cheers.

Jon.

Cool, thanks folks - should have thought of searching for testsuite bugs.

- F.

Jonathan.Haslam at Sun.COM wrote:
> Hi Fintan,
> 
>>
>> Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that 
>> mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by 
>> mib:::udpHCInDatagrams?
>>
>> From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m
asking
>> in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to 
>> udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite.
> 
> Just regarding the test suite failure - this is covered by
> CR 6513018 (tst.udp. needs updating). In that CR there
> is a reference to CR 6501024 (Add support for new
> IP/TCP/UDP MIBs) which, by the look of it, changed the
> counter names.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Jon.