Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches for "datagram".
2012 Aug 30
0
[PATCH 02/11] vmci_datagram.patch: VMCI datagram entity handling.
Signed-off-by: George Zhang <georgezhang at vmware.com>
---
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c | 583 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.h | 55 +++
2 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c
create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.h
diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vm...
2012 Aug 30
0
[PATCH 02/11] vmci_datagram.patch: VMCI datagram entity handling.
Signed-off-by: George Zhang <georgezhang at vmware.com>
---
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c | 583 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.h | 55 +++
2 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c
create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.h
diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vm...
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any...
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any...
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...rkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > Semantic differences between th...
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...rkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > Semantic differences between th...
2023 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 06:21:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > &...
2014 Aug 06
1
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP x.x.x.x. Source name LINUX<00> is one of our names !
Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:21:44.614859, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: process_lanman_packet: Discarding
datagram from IP 192.168.1.6. Source name LINUX<00> is one of our names !
Aug 6 11:22:50 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:22:50.279516, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Aug 6 11:22:50 linux nmbd[2193]: process_lanman_packet: Discarding
datagram from IP 192.168.1.6. So...
2016 Jan 05
2
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
...p. Any
ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18.
FreeNAS box on network A
"
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.054231, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: process_lanman_packet:
Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is
one of our names !
"
TrueNAS active node network A
"
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage8 nmbd[21114]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.052040, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage8 nmbd[21114]: proce...
2007 Nov 15
3
0-length datagram
There appears to be a problem with sending 0-length (UDP) datagrams. I
have a little UDP server running on port 1392, and when I execute the
following client code the server does not receive anything. However if I
change it to data="x", the server receives it just fine.
EM::run {
conn = EM::open_datagram_socket( "", 0 )
data = "...
2007 Feb 09
3
? has mib:::udp[In/Out]Datagrams been superceded by mib:::udpHC[In/Out]Datagrams
Hi,
Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that
mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by
mib:::udpHCInDatagrams?
From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m asking
in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to
udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite.
- Fintan
2009 Jun 07
2
Does this tell me anything? Traffic report
...tration NB <01><02>__MSBROWSE__<02><01>
Frame 1 (110 bytes on wire, 110 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: Cisco-Li_15:1c:11 (00:18:39:15:1c:11), Dst: Broadcast
(ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100), Dst:
192.168.1.255 (192.168.1.255)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: netbios-ns (137), Dst Port: netbios-ns
(137)
NetBIOS Name Service
No. Time Source Destination Protocol
Info
2 0.001369 192.168.1.100 192.168.1.255 NBNS
Registration NB <01><02>__MSBROWSE__<02><01&...
2016 Jan 06
0
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
...is? Samba version is 4.1.18.
>
> FreeNAS box on network A
> "
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.054231,
> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: process_lanman_packet:
> Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00>
> is one of our names !
> "
>
> TrueNAS active node network A
> "
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage8 nmbd[21114]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.052040,
> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
> Jan 5 2...
2005 Sep 11
0
Discard datagram messages
...mbpasswd file in an effort to make our implementation of Samba
better.\
I am still having a great problem with getting messages from the nmbd
daemon saying that
------------------------
[2005/09/10 14:53:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050)
process_browse_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 172.16.0.1. Source
name PEOPLESQUEST<00>
is one of our names !
[2005/09/10 14:56:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050)
process_browse_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 172.16.0.1. Source
name PEOPLESQUEST<00>
is one of our names !
[2005/09/10 15:00:07, 0]...
2014 Apr 15
1
ignoring malformed3 datagram packet
...following:
1) On the AD Member Server periodically (every hour) appears a message
in log.nmbd similar to the following for each of the two clients:
[2014/04/15 13:47:46, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1289(process_dgram)
process_dgram: ignoring malformed3 (datasize = 494, len=408,
off=100) datagram packet sent to name MYDOM<00> from IP 192.168.0.107
2) On at least one of the clients the file shares from the AD Member
Server disconnect from time to time, especially when the client has
not been touched for a while. This means that the mounted network
drives in the Windows Explorer become...
2015 Feb 19
0
[PATCH] VMCI: Check userland-provided datagram size
Ensure that the size filled in by userland in the datagram header
matches the size of the buffer passed down in the IOCTL. Note that we
account for the size of the header itself in the check.
Acked-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com>
Acked-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade at vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy King <acking at vmware.com>
R...
2015 Feb 19
0
[PATCH] VMCI: Check userland-provided datagram size
Ensure that the size filled in by userland in the datagram header
matches the size of the buffer passed down in the IOCTL. Note that we
account for the size of the header itself in the check.
Acked-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com>
Acked-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade at vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy King <acking at vmware.com>
R...
2016 Jan 06
1
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
On 01/06/2016 01:23 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: [2016/01/05 23:17:32.086480,
>> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
>> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: process_lanman_packet:
>> Discarding datagram from IP 172.21.140.17. Source name STORAGE4<00>
>> is one of our names !
>> "
>
> Are you forwarding broadcasts ? This is a debug level 0 log
> coming from process_lanman_packet() telling you you have a
> badly configured network :-).
Is this typically a wiring/t...
2011 Aug 29
1
Samba 3.5.6 - malformed datagram
Hi guys, I'm having a little problem I would ask your help.
I have followed the log of my samba (log.nmbd) and several times I see the
message:
process_dgram: ignoring malformed3 (datasize = X, len = Y, off = Z) datagram
packet sent to name DOMAIN <00> from IP XXX,XXX,XXX,XXX
Is there any way to fix this problem?
I'm using Samba 3.5.6 integrated with LDAP server on a Debian Lenny 5.0.8.
Thanks
Daniel
2010 Jul 22
1
remote vs local window discrepancy
...ets consumed by the server.
Eventually over time this drives the client's remote window count to go to
zero. As an aside the remote window count has to be exactly 0 for the
stall to occur.
Initially the following line of code in channel_output_poll that decrements
the remote window count for datagram channels looked suspicious:
c->remote_window -= dlen + 4;
However, the code that updates Channel.local_window and
Channel.local_consumed for a datagram channel also includes the +4 in the
calculation. Does anybody know why the datagram calculation includes a +4?
Anybody know what would cause...