similar to: ? has mib:::udp[In/Out]Datagrams been superceded by mib:::udpHC[In/Out]Datagrams

I''ve got a Thumper running snv_57 and a large ZFS pool. I recently noticed a drive throwing some read errors, so I did the right thing and zfs replaced it with a spare. Everything went well, but the resilvering process seems to be taking an eternity: # zpool status pool: bigpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was

Hi, I run Samba 2.2.3a (Solaris 7) in domain authentication mode in a Windows 2000 domain. I would like to be able to script file permissions changes from the Windows side using a command line utility, e.g. cacls, however I have only been successful in changing the UNIX world permisssions, not owner and group. A summary follows. Has anyone come across a solution for this? Thanks, Fintan ---

Align ip header to a 16 byte boundary. This patch eliminates noisy warnings on IA64. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c index 44aed80..2724688 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c +++

There's a heap overflow in qemu SLIRP which affects libguestfs, potentially allowing a malicious filesystem to take control of the confining qemu process and from there attack the host. It will affect libguestfs specifically when these two conditions are both met: - You're using the ‘direct’ backend. - Networking is enabled. The direct backend is the default upstream, but not in

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:58:24PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:53:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:24:44PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> > > >

On October 31, 2017 2:32:36 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Kamen <ben at benkamen.net> wrote: >Hey all, > > >?I'm feeling spunky... and want to update nut to handle the new v2.0 >MIB from CyberPower. > >I've looked at the cyberpower v0.1 .c/.h and being new to working on >nut to this level -- anything anyone has to offer on adding code >besides the obvious? >

On November 2, 2017 5:31:42 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Kamen <ben at benkamen.net> wrote: >On 10/31/2017 01:13 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: >> If the new data is in a separate OID tree, it can quite be a new MIB. >Otherwise you can use the UNIQUE flag and set the preferred (e.g. >newer, more precise) source for a value first in the list of same-named >mappings in existing file - if

On 11/02/2017 01:52 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > > I believe the main reason for a new set of .c/.h files here would be if the new MIB is defined in a separate subtree. The top-level mapping binds the vendor entry OIDs (often "hidden" so one has to know where to poke). It may also be higher in the list of snmp-ups.h, in case the device also serves the older MIB but you'd prefer the

Chugging along... Question for the gang -- CyberPower lists other items in their MIB for controlling PD units and some other things. Does NUT support all that and should I make an effort to get all that in or should we skip for now and get UPS primary ingredients inserted and tested? just wondering, ?-Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.

Hey all, ?I'm feeling spunky... and want to update nut to handle the new v2.0 MIB from CyberPower. I've looked at the cyberpower v0.1 .c/.h and being new to working on nut to this level -- anything anyone has to offer on adding code besides the obvious? like: should the 0.1 and 2.0 coexist somehow? (maybe different files) (also, is there a list of all the parms I can match up from the

On 10/31/2017 01:13 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > If the new data is in a separate OID tree, it can quite be a new MIB. Otherwise you can use the UNIQUE flag and set the preferred (e.g. newer, more precise) source for a value first in the list of same-named mappings in existing file - if there's a hit on an actual device, it will be used and not iterated onwards. The flag is not yet supported for

Hello We have Dell servers and need to monitor them through SNMP. but need to install or insert Dell MIBs to our Centos. is copying MIBs are enough ? has any one is using Dell OpenManage on Centos ? Thanks

Guys, on RFC 1628 we have three units of conformace, separated by groups: subset, basic and advanced. Supported subset can be defined on "unit of conformance" groups. Someone know if could we implement some OIDs from 'advanced' group and other from 'basic' group and still "RFC 1628 conformance"? Some thing like upsIdent from "advanced group" and

Hi everyone, I''ve got some trouble with my RoR application running with apache (2.2.9) and mongrel (1.1.5). The site i manage has about 20''000 visits a day, and we run 14 mongrel instances switched with mongrel_cluster (1.0.5). The fact is, sometime, half of my mongrel instances are raising something like 500MiB memory and don''t seem to work anymore. The server itself

Hello. On a Solaris 10 10/08 (137137-09) Sparc system, I setup SMA to also return values for disk usage, by adding the following to snmpd.conf: disk / 5% disk /tmp 10% disk /apps 4% disk /data 3% /data and /apps are on ZFS. But when I do "snmpwalk -v2c -c public 10.0.1.26 UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskPercent", it only returns values for the first two directories (/ and /tmp), which are on UFS

Hi Folks, I've tested and tidied it up. Please accept this contribution for consideration. The patch for snmp-ups.c is against the latest (at 10 am GMT) svn. Any changes you'd like made and tested, please let me know. Regards, - Philip Ward Unix Systems Administrator Ext 7274 -- The Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2009/2010 The University of Stirling is a charity

Dear folks, According to mge-mib.c (NUT 2.6.2) LB condition is gained from variable .1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.5.14.0 (i.e. upsmgBatteryLowBattery.0). The test device of me does not set this variable to yes(1) even if runtime drops below the preconfigured limit. I complained about this at Schneider Electric. They replied that low battery status is indicated by .1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.5.14.0

Hi, I updated apc-mib.c to use the high precision values, and added input.transfer.reason. I hope you will find the patch useful. https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=313679 Regards, Hong-Gunn

hi, i have trouble with snmp mib, atemp configured the snmp-ups, but it doesn't work , after the command /lib/nut/snmp-ups -DDDDDD -a katodo -x mibs=mge , the message say "0.006471 Unknown mibs value:". My snmp board is a cp504 netagent , may be someone can help me? what mib i must use? sld2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

2014-02-12 10:13 GMT+01:00 <hamid.nabil at coop.no>: > Arnaud, > > > > I see your name all over when I look for Netvision MIB. Thought maybe you > can help me. I want the MIB for our UPS (SOCOMEC) with NetVision 6.0 > > > > I appreciate your help in advanceJ > > Regards > > Hamid Nabil > > > Hello Hamid, the procedure describing how to do