> On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > > > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: > > >> Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my understanding. So I was hoping to hear Dovecot either already had support or there were plans to implement it. > > > > > > Virtual folder does not scale. Thank you for naming a client that does multisearch! > > > > Virtual folder scales just fine. What makes you think it does not? > > > > We have customers that have users with thousand folders and millions of emails and still virtual folder scales. > > > > Sami > > > > is this possible to *hide* the virtual folder from listing but make it SELECTable / EXAMINEable from IMAP? > >namespace { location = virtual:... hidden = yes } Aki
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:16 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:> > > On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: > > > >> Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. > My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really > enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via > MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my understanding. So I was hoping to hear > Dovecot either already had support or there were plans to implement it. > > > > > > > > Virtual folder does not scale. Thank you for naming a client that > does multisearch! > > > > > > Virtual folder scales just fine. What makes you think it does not? > > > > > > We have customers that have users with thousand folders and millions > of emails and still virtual folder scales. > > > > > > Sami > > > > > > > is this possible to *hide* the virtual folder from listing but make it > SELECTable / EXAMINEable from IMAP? > > > > > > namespace { > location = virtual:... > hidden = yes > } > > Aki >* NAMESPACE (("" "/")) NIL NIL a OK Namespace completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). *a list "" "*"** LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" FromL3 * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Apple * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" JunkMail * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked \Trash) "/" Trash * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT ** LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual** LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder list, is this expected? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200511/800722c1/attachment-0001.html>
> On 11/05/2020 14:09 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:16 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: > > > > >> Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my understanding. So I was hoping to hear Dovecot either already had support or there were plans to implement it. > > > > > > > > > > Virtual folder does not scale. Thank you for naming a client that does multisearch! > > > > > > > > Virtual folder scales just fine. What makes you think it does not? > > > > > > > > We have customers that have users with thousand folders and millions of emails and still virtual folder scales. > > > > > > > > Sami > > > > > > > > > > is this possible to *hide* the virtual folder from listing but make it SELECTable / EXAMINEable from IMAP? > > > > > > > > > > namespace { > > location = virtual:... > > hidden = yes > > } > > > > Aki > > > * NAMESPACE (("" "/")) NIL NIL > a OK Namespace completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). > a list "" "*"* LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" FromL3 > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Apple > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" JunkMail > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked \Trash) "/" Trash > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX > a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). > > It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder list, is this expected? >Sorry, forgot to say hidden=yes list=no Aki