search for: examineable

hello, > subset(swiss, Agriculture > 60 & Examination != c(14,16), select = c(Agriculture,Examination,Catholic)) Agriculture Examination Catholic Broye 70.2 16 3.30 Glane 67.8 14 4.20 Aigle 62.0 21 5.16 Avenches 60.7 19 5.23 Cossonay 69.3 22 5.62

Dear R users, I'm hoping that more experienced users will be able to assist me in examining the model fit of a mixed generalised linear model. The example using the data 'bacteria' within the MASS package will hopefully illustrate what I would like to acheive; library(MASS) library(nlme) attach(bacteria) # y being output and the trt - treatment group being an explanatory variable.

Hello. I would like to transfer files which have changed on another box. The rsync man page says: --size-only ..This is useful when starting to use rsync after using another mirroring system which may not preserve timestamps exactly.. Which is my situation. My problem is that the size-only switch (clearly) ignores files with different content, but that have the same size. I'd like to

Hi! Is this a bug according to the other one? When i try to open a real or virtual mailbox, i often (not on every mailbox) get this error-message: J?n 04 11:03:32 aldebaran dovecot[24534]: imap(jakob)<24705><Ug/EcfBhSrDAqAAO>: Panic: Leaked view for index /var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/Maildir/jakob/INBOX/dovecot.index: Opened in index-storage.c:336 J?n 04 11:03:32 aldebaran

In dovecot-2.2.1 neither the SELECT nor the EXAMINE commands include an untagged URLMECH reply. (Note, this is not the one mandated by the RESETKEY command.) AFAICT RFC 4467 does not require an URLMECH reply to SELECT or EXAMINE but without it clients have no way of knowing about authorization mechanisms other than INTERNAL. Now I know dovecot-2.2 supports only the INTERNAL mechanism at present

a EXAMINE INBOX [...] a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. a EXAMINE "" a NO Empty mailbox name. [Should be in authenticated mode with no active mailbox. But...] a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY) * STATUS "INBOX" (UIDVALIDITY 1255685337) a OK [CLIENTBUG] Status on selected mailbox completed. a UNSELECT a OK Unselect completed. a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY) * STATUS "INBOX"

Hi, I have been able to successfully use crash to examine a crash dump of kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 using the following command: crash /boot/System.map-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE/vmlinux ./vmcore I then installed the package kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 and rebooted with that (there is no PAE debugging kernels in the repository). I reproduced my

New crash most likely related to Virtual plugin again: Apr 26 07:40:40 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 1836 (mailbox_transaction_begin): assertion failed: (box->opened) Apr 26 07:40:40 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x6bc0f) [0x7fdfce48ac0f] ->

I am trying to configure dovecot-1.2.11 to have the same IMAP namespacing as courier-imap as per http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier, but failing badly. I have a test maildir with INBOX and folder 'junk'. Without fiddling with namespaces, this works fine: there are 91 msgs in INBOX and 2 in junk. a namespace * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL a OK Namespace

Help! I am unsure if I can analyze data from the following experiment. Fish were placed in a tank at (t=0) Measurements of Carbon Dioxide were taken each day for 120 days (t=0,...120) A few fish were then randomly pulled out of the tank at different days, killed and examined for the presence of a disease T= time of examination in days from start (i.e. 85th day), E = 0/1 for nonevent/event My

Running 2.3.0~alpha0-1~auto+1045, basically as a proxy between MUA and Exchange (IMAP): Sep 7 16:10:32 mproxy dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<holtgrem>, method=PLAIN, rip=172.16.128.8, lip=141.42.206.11, mpid=61031, TLS, session=<fp3JBZpYop+sEIAI> Sep 7 16:10:32 mproxy dovecot: imap(holtgrem)<fp3JBZpYop+sEIAI>: imapc(exchange-imap.charite.de:993): Connected to

I am building code which needs to examine dominating relationships between Basic Blocks. I searched the Programming Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#common), it mentioned briefly that such details will be covered in the future. So, I am tuning to the list and ask. Say, I have BasicBlock * a, *b, and need to know whether a DOM b, (a DOMi b, a DOMp b, a PostDOM b), etc. How

RFC 5162 [3.1] states that a QRESYNC should return all changes in a SELECT/EXAMINE since the given modseq. In the following case, it looks like there is an off-by-1 error somewhere: C: A64 SELECT "TestMailboxTest" (QRESYNC (1224531494 6 1,3:5)) [MMS: MODSEQ given is 6] S: * OK [CLOSED] S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged

Dear community, I'm trying to examine my grouped data following page 6 http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Fox-Companion/appendix-mixed-models.pdf. I'm trying lmList this way: model.list <- lmList(log(v.dep) ~ log(v2) +log(v4) + v3 | v5, subset = v6=0, data=data) and obtain this error message: In Ops.factor(v4, v4) : | not meaningful for factors My original model is

Does anyone know if the lmer function of lme4 works fine for unbalanced designs? I have the examination results of 1000 pupils on three subjects, one score every term. So, I have three scores for English (one for every term), three scores for maths etc. However, not everybody was examined in maths, not everybody was examined in English etc, but everybody was in effect examined on four subjects. I

This is a different bug, and I suspect it might be caused by virtual plugin. We'll look into it. Aki On 04.01.2018 23:41, Jakob Sch?rz wrote: > Hi! > > This is very strange... > This error affects only one mailaccount, and it happend not yesterday. > The file > > /var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/Maildir/jakob/INBOX/dovecot.index > > which hat "Panic: Leaked view

On 9/19/19 10:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This filter can be used to transparently reopen/retry when a plugin > fails. The connection is closed and reopened which for most plugins > causes them to attempt to reconnect to their source. > > For example if doing a long or slow SSH copy: > > nbdkit -U - ssh host=remote /var/tmp/test.iso \ > --run 'qemu-img

On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > In LiveIntervals::processImplicitDefs() we have this: > > for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = mri_->use_begin(Reg), > UE = mri_->use_end(); UI != UE; ) { > MachineOperand &RMO = UI.getOperand(); > MachineInstr *RMI = &*UI; > ++UI; > MachineBasicBlock *RMBB

Hey All, I have a dump of a VM using /opt/xensource/libexec/dumpcore on XS5.5 Does anyone know what tools can be used to examine the resultant dump? Regards David _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Dear all I have a model that looks like this: m1 <- lmer(Difference ~ 1+ (1|Examiner) + (1|Item), data=englisho.data) I know it is not possible to estimate random effects but one can obtain BLUPs of the conditional modes with re1 <- ranef(m1, postVar=T) And then dotplot(re1) for the examiner and item levels gives me a nice prediction interval. But I would like to have the prediction