search for: unmark

...PACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS BINARY MOVE SNIPPET=FUZZY PREVIEW=FUZZY PREVIEW STATUS=SIZE SAVEDATE LITERAL+ NOTIFY SPECIAL-USE QUOTA] Logged in as userx 1 LIST "" "*" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "IGARSS 2024" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." IAC2022 * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Junk) "." Junk * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "&A5UDwAO5A8QDwQO,A8ADrg- &A5kDwwPMA8QDtwPEA7EDwg-" * LIST (\HasNoChildren)...

Can you please try doveadm exec imap -u username_of_the_user 1 LIST "" "*" and see if it is there? Aki > On 22/02/2023 14:28 EET Nikolaos Milas <nmilas at noa.gr> wrote: > > > On 21/2/2023 9:56 ?.?., Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Can you enable mail_debug=yes, restart, ask the user to access the folder(s) and provide those logs? > > > > Hi

...To create a test system I copied mail from my wife and myself into /var/spool/imap. This mail was already in maildir format from our mail clients. I set the mail env to maildir:/var/spool/imap/%u. Below is a session (via telnet): <begin> . OK Logged in. . list "" * * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "blackbox" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "blackbox-devel" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "debian-devel" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "debian-dpkg" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "debian-ipv6" * LIST (\UnMarked) ".&qu...

...LEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES > WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS BINARY MOVE SNIPPET=FUZZY > PREVIEW=FUZZY PREVIEW STATUS=SIZE SAVEDATE LITERAL+ NOTIFY SPECIAL-USE > QUOTA] Logged in as userx > 1 LIST "" "*" > ... > * LIST (\HasChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active" > * LIST (\HasChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European.URBAN > RELEAF" > * LIST (\HasChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants...

...ould still return a tagged OK reply. May be that is the reason for this response? Is it possible to find more details in server logs why STATUS is missing? C: B00000007 LIST "" "INBOX.*" RETURN (SUBSCRIBED CHILDREN STATUS (HIGHESTMODSEQ)) S: * LIST (\Subscribed \HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." INBOX.gfgfee888 S: * STATUS INBOX.gfgfee888 (HIGHESTMODSEQ 1) S: * LIST (\Subscribed \HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." INBOX.99999999 S: * STATUS INBOX.99999999 (HIGHESTMODSEQ 3) S: * LIST (\Subscribed \HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." INBOX.yyyyyyyyyyyyy S: * STATUS IN...

...ipp2p v0.8.1_rc1 --bit MARK set 0x4 49411 28M CONNMARK all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x4 CONNMARK save 24859 32M LOG all -- * vlan1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 length 100:65535 MARK match 0x0 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `UNMARKED Packet: '' 29544 32M MARK all -- * vlan1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK match 0x0 MARK set 0x3 Kernel log (snippet): --------------------- Sep 11 14:31:01 (none) kern.warn kernel: UNMARKED Packet: IN= OUT=vlan1 SRC=192.168.1.105 DST=87.11.229.118 LEN=1300 TOS=...

...ent directory to ~. This wound up causing users to set their IMAP server directory to "/home/<user>/mail/" so that their mailboxes would be found: --> A104 LIST "/home/dp/mail/" "%" * LIST (\NoSelect) "/" /home/dp/mail/ * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" /home/dp/mail/sent-mail-Jul-2006 * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" /home/dp/mail/sent-mail-Dec-2004 ... A104 OK LIST completed Of course, relative paths also work, but it seems that not many users are using them: --> A105 LIST "mail/" "%&...

...DEX=expunged.list.index:SUBSCRIPTIONS=expunged.subscriptions ### also from userdb } plugin { lazy_expunge = EXPUNGED/ } ----8<----- (full doveconf available on request) State of the account before delete: mailbox "Test" exists, 20 messages in it: x LIST * * * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Trash) "/" Trash * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" Test * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Junk) "/" Spam * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Sent * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Drafts * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX x OK Li...

...quot; "INBOX.Drafts" * LIST (\Marked \HasChildren) "." "INBOX" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "INBOX.INBOX" . OK LIST completed This is Dovecot: . namespace . BAD Error in IMAP command NAMESPACE: Unknown command. . list "" * * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "Drafts" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "Sent" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "Queue" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "schmendrick" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "newsletters" * LIST (\UnMarked) "." "Trash&quo...

...10 version of Dovecot (and possibly earlier versions). Looked into it and I am seeing odd behavior with the LIST command. Here is how to reproduce problem, unless I'm missing something obvious: a001 login dean <password> a001 OK Logged in. a002 list "" * * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "Sent" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "Trash" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "Drafts" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "INBOX" a002 OK List completed. a003 list "" Trash* * LIST (\NoInferi...

...> namespace { > > location = virtual:... > > hidden = yes > > } > > > > Aki > > > * NAMESPACE (("" "/")) NIL NIL > a OK Namespace completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). > a list "" "*"* LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" FromL3 > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Apple > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" JunkMail > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked \Trash) "/" Trash > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts > * LIST (\HasNoChi...

We're converting UW-IMAP users here to dovecot. Some of them have seen the error message issued when Thunderbird clients try to delete folders and I understand what's going on (from previous postings) that Dovecot doesn't support mbox subfolders within folders. What puzzles me is that many of these users already have folders within folders (I've found typically 2 levels of

> On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > > > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: > > >> Thank

...39;t really have a 'do-nothing' function on SSA values - the result of the > function is always going to be a copy of the value, not the original value > that was passed in. That doesn't seem like a huge problem. In the common case, the "marked" SSA value and the "unmarked" original wouldn't be live simultaneously. Uses of the unmarked version reachable from the mark intrinsic can either be treated as a separate value or just left undefined. It makes sense to also add an "unmark" intrinsic to define when the SSA stack root goes out of scope

...CES MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE LOGIN-REFERRALS UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1] Logged in as jp3 a list test/ * * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "test/a1" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "test/a1/b1" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "test/a1/b1/c1" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "test/a1/b1/c2" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "test/a1/b2" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "test/a2" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" &qu...

...e hidden namespaces with prefixes "~/mail/", "~%u/mail/" and "mail/". LIST "~/mail" "*" returns nothing, so I've tried adding another namespace for "~/mail". Now LIST "~/mail" "*" returns * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mailtest1/test1-2" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mailtest2" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" "~/mailtest3" whereas UW-IMAP returns * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "/" ~/mail/test1/test1-2 * LIST (\NoInferi...

....C.D -j RETURN # Classify outgoing traffic by mark; incoming by private destination. tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip handle 0xABCD fw classid 1:N tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip u32 match ip dst A.B.C.D flowid 1:N My problem is with efficiently discarding all unmarked traffic. I am now doing this as follows: # This goes after all the per-user "good mark" rules: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 0xfffffff # And this throws away "bad mark" packets. tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip handle 0xfffff...

...sion is: mb1 LIST "" "#mbox.%" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#mbox.folder" mb1 OK List completed. mb2 LIST "" "#mbox.folder.%" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#mbox.folder." * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "." "#mbox.folder.folder1a" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "." "#mbox.folder.folder1b" * LIST (\NoInferiors \UnMarked) "." "#mbox.folder.folder1c" mb2 OK List completed. md1 LIST "" "#maildir.%" * LIST (\H...

I'm on LinuxMint 17 Cinnamon desktop, Samba 4.2.1, and Windows 7 I can share folders fine, but when I unshare a folder, it remains visible and accessible to users. It should disappear and become inaccessible when unshared. Repro steps - sharing the folder: 1. Open up the Cinnamon file manager, navigate to Home folder. 2. Right click on Downloads, choose Sharing Options

...s >> > > } >> > > >> > > Aki >> > >> > >> > * NAMESPACE (("" "/")) NIL NIL >> > a OK Namespace completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). >> > a list "" "*"* LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" FromL3 >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" Apple >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "/" JunkMail >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked \Trash) "/" Trash >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) &qu...