search for: namepsace

...Drafts >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT >> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX >> > a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). >> > >> > It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder >> list, is this expected? >> > >> >> Sorry, forgot to say >> >> hidden=yes >> list=no >> >> Aki >> > >thanks it is working now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment...

...(\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX > a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). > > It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder list, is this expected? > Sorry, forgot to say hidden=yes list=no Aki

> On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong <joewong99 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10. May 2020, at 1.51, Peter <pch at myzel.net> wrote: > > > > > > Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: > > >> Thank

...t;/" Trash * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked \Drafts) "/" Drafts * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT ** LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual** LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder list, is this expected? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200511/800722c1/attachment-0001.html>

...ed \Drafts) "/" Drafts > > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Marked) "/" SENT > > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" virtual* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX > > a OK List completed (0.003 + 0.000 + 0.003 secs). > > > > It's now hidden in the namepsace but I can still see it in the folder > list, is this expected? > > > > Sorry, forgot to say > > hidden=yes > list=no > > Aki > thanks it is working now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermai...

Hi R-users, I would like to detach and installed the fBasics package but it gives me this message: >     detach("package:fBasics",unload=TRUE) Error in detach("package:fBasics", unload = TRUE) : invalid name >     install.packages(repos=NULL,pkgs="c:\\Tinn-R\\fBasics_2100.77.zip") package 'fBasics' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked Warning:

r-devel, In a development version of the CRAN package metrumrg, I write ... require(reshape) setGeneric('cast') setOldClass(c('keyed','data.frame')) setMethod('cast','keyed', function ...) The result is satisfactory when sourcing the code directly, but when checking the package (which has 'reshape' as a dependency in the DESCRIPTION file) I get

The coxme package has a ranef() method, as does lme4. I'm having trouble getting them to play together, as shown below. (The particular model in the example isn't defensible, but uses a standard data set.) The problem is that most of the time only one of lme4 or coxme will be loaded, so each needs to define the basic ranef function as well as a method for it. But when loaded together

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in