dovecot - Feb 2014 - realtime backup with LDA?

On 2/24/2014 9:25 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at
smail.inf.fh-brs.de>
>> wrote:
>>> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such 
>>> situation. See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for 
>>> one mail address. 
>>
>> The only downside to this is all of the original headers are *not* 
>> preserved in the BCC copy.
>
> Er, I don't know what you mean with "all of the original
headers".
> There are no headers of the delivery process to user, that's right. 
> Everything else should be untouchted. Or in other words, the backup 
> copy does not "backup" the delivery process.
As Stan so graciously pointed out, I was talking about the specific MTA 
that I use - postfix - and I based my comment on the fact that everyone 
on the postfix list, including Wietse, stated that using the BCC method 
does *not* preserve all of the original message headers (identically to 
the non BCC'd copy).

Are you saying Wietse was incorrect?

-- 

Best regards,

Charles

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:44:15 -0500
> From: Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com>
> Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> To: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] realtime backup with LDA?
> 
> On 2/24/2014 9:25 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at
smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at
smail.inf.fh-brs.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in
such situation.
>>>> See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one mail
address.
>>> 
>>> The only downside to this is all of the original headers are *not* 
>>> preserved in the BCC copy.
>> 
>> Er, I don't know what you mean with "all of the original
headers". There
>> are no headers of the delivery process to user, that's right.
Everything
>> else should be untouchted. Or in other words, the backup copy does not 
>> "backup" the delivery process.
>
> As Stan so graciously pointed out, I was talking about the specific MTA
that
> I use - postfix - and I based my comment on the fact that everyone on the 
> postfix list, including Wietse, stated that using the BCC method does *not*
> preserve all of the original message headers (identically to the non
BCC'd
> copy).
>
> Are you saying Wietse was incorrect?
What changes are made by default, that are not implemented by the MTA 
admin? And yes, if I have two recipients of one message, I expect the 
headers stay untouched. If we enter the discussion "shall the MTA remove 
the "for XYZ" from Received headers", if one add a recipient, I
back out.
:-)

- -- 
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBUwthl3D1/YhP6VMHAQKtaAf/SFASDui9ShrUK5CQb3ohwS43lf18OOFu
nUcwuVD5oFO2GQ40ukTrwXAybJZIdG5wmmN6nxhVmUcKPd3bRe75hYLLdIwURgPD
KYciseZ+lKGotIuLulE0uPsrQapXFDDcrJ5Heg3kAoIG9TH6EQ0vaXNexNnKnQ/F
UPQwkcBFnVBmK3lFJwZKMAzsrjql1lRc+D2v9CZ3ras2HzfSKfHQ86w9LV2jBDsA
7wsf0wTXAKGqb54Z5LiIZQLw5EVJxyKqByH1kRzT/xWSbawmkk7sgPvo2P9IOoui
oi9zSYIiOfMfVY0ZmfaCkR5AlK/QWej1JY4Ezs36zgAQkzSW2Sm8iQ==kh35
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----