Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "iqevawubuwthl3d1".
2014 Feb 24
2
realtime backup with LDA?
...cipients of one message, I expect the
headers stay untouched. If we enter the discussion "shall the MTA remove
the "for XYZ" from Received headers", if one add a recipient, I back out.
:-)
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBUwthl3D1/YhP6VMHAQKtaAf/SFASDui9ShrUK5CQb3ohwS43lf18OOFu
nUcwuVD5oFO2GQ40ukTrwXAybJZIdG5wmmN6nxhVmUcKPd3bRe75hYLLdIwURgPD
KYciseZ+lKGotIuLulE0uPsrQapXFDDcrJ5Heg3kAoIG9TH6EQ0vaXNexNnKnQ/F
UPQwkcBFnVBmK3lFJwZKMAzsrjql1lRc+D2v9CZ3ras2HzfSKfHQ86w9LV2jBDsA
7wsf0wTXAKGqb54Z5LiIZQLw5EVJxyKqByH1kRzT/xWSbawmkk7sgPvo...
2014 Feb 24
2
realtime backup with LDA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote:
>> I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such situation.
>> See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one mail address.
>
> The only downside to this is all of