Hi all,
Ok, I have:
login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lport=%{lport}
mpid=%e %c session=<%{session}>
We only allow inbound IMAP, and only SSL on port 993.
Looking at the logs, %c is obviously the encryption type, but...
Why does it say 'TLS', when it technically (there is a difference after
all) should say 'SSL'?
Not a big deal, but it is just something I've been meaning to ask.
--
Best regards,
*/Charles/*
Am 26.02.2013 21:05, schrieb Charles Marcus:> Why does it say 'TLS', when it technically (there is a difference after all) should say 'SSL'? > Not a big deal, but it is just something I've been meaning to askbecause it is practically the same? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 263 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20130226/4ac5b215/attachment.bin>
On 2013-02-26 3:58 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:> and to make you completly weird > > dovecot, postfix and many others are using OpenSSL libraries > which does oh wonder TLS while GnuTLS can do SSL as wellAbsolutely no idea what you said or meant here... -- Best regards, */Charles/*
Am 26.02.2013 22:41, schrieb Charles Marcus:> On 2013-02-26 3:58 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> and to make you completly weird >> >> dovecot, postfix and many others are using OpenSSL libraries >> which does oh wonder TLS while GnuTLS can do SSL as well > > Absolutely no idea what you said or meant here...if it is not the same why are doing GnuTLS and OpenSSL finnaly both? HMM - because TLS is SSL3.1 is the reason and in fact due development it was indeed called SSL3.1 before someone changed the name to TLS -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 263 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20130226/029d3fdb/attachment.bin>
At 10PM +0100 on 26/02/13 you (Reindl Harald) wrote:> Am 26.02.2013 22:41, schrieb Charles Marcus: > > > > Absolutely no idea what you said or meant here... > > if it is not the same why are doing GnuTLS and OpenSSL > finnaly both? HMM - because TLS is SSL3.1 is the reason > and in fact due development it was indeed called SSL3.1 > before someone changed the name to TLSEven if punctuation is too much to ask, could you at least *try* to write coherent English sentences? Ben
Am 26.02.2013 23:30, schrieb Ben Morrow:> At 10PM +0100 on 26/02/13 you (Reindl Harald) wrote: >> Am 26.02.2013 22:41, schrieb Charles Marcus: >>> >>> Absolutely no idea what you said or meant here... >> >> if it is not the same why are doing GnuTLS and OpenSSL >> finnaly both? HMM - because TLS is SSL3.1 is the reason >> and in fact due development it was indeed called SSL3.1 >> before someone changed the name to TLS > > Even if punctuation is too much to ask, could you at least *try* to > write coherent English sentences?in short for you: TLS === SSL 3.1 could the OP at least read basic documentations is the better question -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 263 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20130226/04400767/attachment-0001.bin>