On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:> > > Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for >>>> *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually >>>> commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] >>>> sown >>>> to the techies which are forced into "features" and "delivery dates" to >>>> achieve some "company defined goal" - and that is usually not "bug >>>> free", "safe", or the like. Free software/OSS just happens that *at >>>> least* half of it should come from the "working level" and that is - at >>>> least - much more - ahemm - "inconvenient" for sales people) >> >> FWIW the context were large "old-school" corps (like Novell or Oracle) >> taking over free software companies. >> >>> that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would >> >> Define "true Linux distribution". > > who the fuck was talking abiut "true Linux distribution"?you were cockhead, not taking your drugs again reindl eh or may be you are taking too much of the illegal ones and none of the ones the doctors prescribed you
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for >>>>> *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually >>>>> commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] >>>>> sown >>>>> to the techies which are forced into "features" and "delivery dates" to >>>>> achieve some "company defined goal" - and that is usually not "bug >>>>> free", "safe", or the like. Free software/OSS just happens that *at >>>>> least* half of it should come from the "working level" and that is - at >>>>> least - much more - ahemm - "inconvenient" for sales people) >>> >>> FWIW the context were large "old-school" corps (like Novell or Oracle) >>> taking over free software companies. >>> >>>> that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would >>> >>> Define "true Linux distribution". >> >> who the fuck was talking abiut "true Linux distribution"? > > you were cockheadno and if someone can't read a simple paragraph beause a missing comma it's not a compliment for him >>>> that is simple not true - if it would be true, >>>> linux distributions would> not taking your drugs again reindl eh or may be you > are taking too much of the illegal ones and none of the ones the > doctors prescribed yougo and f** yourself since i didn't ask you to speak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150402/f26db17e/attachment.sig>
Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia: >> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>> that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions >>>>> would >>>> >>>> Define "true Linux distribution". >>> >>> who the fuck was talking abiut "true Linux distribution"? >> >> you were cockhead > > no and if someone can't read a simple paragraph beause a missing comma > it's not a compliment for himYour sentence was not really entirely precise. What's the harm in saying sorry instead of barking at people? Cheers, -- j.hofm?ller mur.sat -- a space art project http://sat.mur.at/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150402/60bbff3c/attachment.sig>
On 4/2/15, Edwardo Garcia <wdgarc88 at gmail.com> wrote:> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> >> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: >>>>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for >>>>> *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually >>>>> commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] >>>>> sown >>>>> to the techies which are forced into "features" and "delivery dates" >>>>> to >>>>> achieve some "company defined goal" - and that is usually not "bug >>>>> free", "safe", or the like. Free software/OSS just happens that *at >>>>> least* half of it should come from the "working level" and that is - >>>>> at >>>>> least - much more - ahemm - "inconvenient" for sales people) >>> >>> FWIW the context were large "old-school" corps (like Novell or Oracle) >>> taking over free software companies. >>> >>>> that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would >>> >>> Define "true Linux distribution". >> >> who the fuck was talking abiut "true Linux distribution"? > > you were cockhead, not taking your drugs again reindl eh or may be you > are taking too much of the illegal ones and none of the ones the > doctors prescribed you >hahahahahahahahahaha right on brother! Oh I must remember to use that more often when calling him out for the troll he is - thats just GOLD!