Currently the typical rejection message is: --------- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Quota exceeded. --------- Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get confused. Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the "Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent" even needs to be in there. How about something like: --------- Your message to <foo at bar.org> was automatically rejected: Quota exceeded. See the attachment for the original message's headers. --------- And should I change this for v1.0.1 already? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070523/1c612d02/attachment-0002.bin>
Hi Timo. Is there any header that it define client's language? That would give a customized answer to the language of the client. Another possibility is to give two answers: one in English and another one in the default language of server. Example: Cuota de espacio excedida / Quota exceeded. Timo Sirainen escribi?:> Currently the typical rejection message is: > > --------- > Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. > > The following reason was given: > Quota exceeded. > --------- > > Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course > there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get confused. > > Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the > "Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent" even needs to be in there. How about > something like: > > --------- > Your message to <foo at bar.org> was automatically rejected: > Quota exceeded. > > See the attachment for the original message's headers. > --------- > > And should I change this for v1.0.1 already? > >
2007. May 23., Timo Sirainen:> Currently the typical rejection message is: > > --------- > Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery > Agent. > > The following reason was given: > Quota exceeded. > --------- > > Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of > course there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get > confused. > > Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the > "Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent" even needs to be in there. How aboutProbably you're better off excluding Dovecot program information from this kind of bounces. See Postfix's Changelog[1]: [...] Major changes - delivery status notifications --------------------------------------------- [...] [Incompat 20060806] Postfix no longer announces its name in delivery status notifications. Users believe that Wietse provides a free help desk service that solves all their email problems. [...]> something like: > > --------- > Your message to <foo at bar.org> was automatically rejected: > Quota exceeded. > > See the attachment for the original message's headers. > --------- > > And should I change this for v1.0.1 already?[1] - ftp://postfix.cloud9.net/official/postfix-2.4.1.RELEASE_NOTES -- Daniel
Hi Timo. Is there any header that it define client's language? That would give a customized answer to the language of the client. Another possibility is to give two answers: one in English and another one in the default language of server. Example: Cuota de espacio excedida / Quota exceeded. Timo Sirainen escribi?:> Currently the typical rejection message is: > > --------- > Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. > > The following reason was given: > Quota exceeded. > --------- > > Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course > there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get confused. > > Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the > "Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent" even needs to be in there. How about > something like: > > --------- > Your message to <foo at bar.org> was automatically rejected: > Quota exceeded. > > See the attachment for the original message's headers. > --------- > > And should I change this for v1.0.1 already?