http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing sendmail. + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a fatal - APPEND / SEARCH: If internaldate was outside valid value for time_t, we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid range is usually for years 1902..2037. See ChangeLog for more. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070612/0e4326ef/attachment-0002.bin>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:01:13PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz > > Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few > more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: > > + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and > exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing > sendmail. > + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a fatal > - APPEND / SEARCH: If internaldate was outside valid value for time_t, > we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit > systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid > range is usually for years 1902..2037. > > See ChangeLog for more. >Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070613/71664c13/attachment-0002.bin>
On 06/13/07 Axel wrote:> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:01:13PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz> Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?With mysql going just great :) maciek -- _0_ Maciej Friedel <biuro at wwv.pl> __0 http://wwv.pl - us?ugi hostingowe 000 http://eprogram.pl - projektowanie stron www
* Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>:> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz > > Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few > more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: > > + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and > exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing > sendmail.Works for mail.> + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a fatal > - APPEND / SEARCH: If internaldate was outside valid value for time_t, > we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit > systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid > range is usually for years 1902..2037. > > See ChangeLog for more.When starting, dovecot reports being 1.0.0 instaead of 1.0.1rc3!! -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de) plonk at charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de Confusion is permanent; its focus shifts with time. -- Karsten M. Self, confused, as usual.
Axel Thimm wrote:> > Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?Not the RC, but I'm on the edge of my seat to see if 1.0.1 final is available on ATrpms before end of life for Fedora Core 5. Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hello,> + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and > exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing > sendmail.I'm still curious, what permanent problems a MDA may encounter? http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022503.html When the MTA is sure, the recipient is local, there must be some sort of configuration error and, hence, the problem is temporarily and should be fixed rather soon than have the mail bounced. Does somebody disable an (valid) user at MDA-stage? I suggest to tempfail Deliver for all problems. Bye, - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRnEDFC9SORjhbDpvAQIhmgf+I7bdr8z10Mb3uIXl7IcEeEt+yL+KQVZh cf4rNEKk0XG7tpr2J1GABcJf2HPwY9gbChyxWhs/os7qkKSV/DGTyePznjbIDQjY 14DKOt4gGAIr9UwrnN6Anyi8u8V7a9sbw/7w55ZSkhJgLWb11cyBwhY8+on815Wg eWItKxIB+htiYN3454rxppueCFGpwTf/oNn+I8VYxfl6W+YRf6xUs1b0Mcal91Ev V0nf3Qm5uYdPVfTUvWg7HEgghJu6ev4BhdmWJ4TR2oOSePZ88tdi8akwOEzSp363 KbN9SvePh1vf53Z48m4GxBo8VrI1KoLmOjtlmMbutPJiSKirkiPb4Q==g29b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----