On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 17:37, Paul Adams wrote:> What is the function of the X-UID header in mbox format?
Dovecot gets IMAP UID from it. The header isn't supposed to be sent to
clients at all, but the current code still does..
> Running Thunderbird 0.5 against a Dovecot IMAP server with mbox format,
> Thunderbird displays these UID numbers in the message list, which is
> fairly useless -- I want a numbered list of my messages starting at 1
> (which Pine, for example, is happy to provide).
Does Thunderbird actually use the X-UID header, not just the IMAP UID
that gets sent separately? If the X-UID header is the problem, it's then
Dovecot bug that it shows the header to Thunderbird.
If Thunderbird just uses IMAP UID and shows it, I agree it's pretty
useless but that's for Thunderbird to fix.
> I'm just wondering whether this is Dovecot's fault,
Thunderbird's fault,
> or an ambiguity in the mbox standard.
IMAP clients shouldn't know anything about what kind of mailbox format
is being used in server side.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040225/83be7c22/attachment-0001.bin>