hi, in evo when I open my mailbox INBOX is in the middle of my foder list. it seems evo sort folders alphanumericaly and eg Drafts is before INBOX. is there any way to put the inbox as the first folder? it very annoying:-( ps. anyway what is the status of the new indexing code and the thread view bug? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:11, Farkas Levente wrote:> hi, > in evo when I open my mailbox INBOX is in the middle of my foder list. > it seems evo sort folders alphanumericaly and eg Drafts is before > INBOX. is there any way to put the inbox as the first folder? it very > annoying:-(Yes, it's pretty stupid. My mailbox names all begin with lowercase letter, so INBOX is the first in the list :) Anyway, this is Evolution's internal behaviour so Dovecot can't change it.> ps. anyway what is the status of the new indexing code and the thread > view bug? > thanks.I've been promising to get new indexing code to work at the beginning of February, hopefully I'm able to do that :) Next actual release then probably at the end of February. The indexing code itself is about 80% implemented, next big thing is that most of maildir/mbox handling code needs rewriting.. Thread view bug? .. You probably mean that new mails show up under some very old mails and gets kind of lost. If I change that behaviour I'll break RFC compatibility. There was some talk about adding some new extension to THREAD to change it's behaviour, but no-one's tried to push it recently. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040113/b7887866/attachment-0001.bin>
Farkas Levente wrote :> hi, > in evo when I open my mailbox INBOX is in the middle of my foder list. > it seems evo sort folders alphanumericaly and eg Drafts is before > INBOX. is there any way to put the inbox as the first folder? it very > annoying:-( > > ps. anyway what is the status of the new indexing code and the thread > view bug?Why do you post to Dovecot mailing list ? This is not a problem of the server. -- DINH V. Hoa, etPan! - newsreader, mail user agent -- http://libetpan.sf.net/etpan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040113/bb401683/attachment-0001.bin>
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 12:43, Timo Sirainen wrote:> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:11, Farkas Levente wrote: > > hi, > > in evo when I open my mailbox INBOX is in the middle of my foder list. > > it seems evo sort folders alphanumericaly and eg Drafts is before > > INBOX. is there any way to put the inbox as the first folder? it very > > annoying:-( > > Yes, it's pretty stupid. My mailbox names all begin with lowercase > letter, so INBOX is the first in the list :) Anyway, this is Evolution's > internal behaviour so Dovecot can't change it.Drafts is uppercase however backup is lowercase and still BEFORE INBOX! anyway I post it to evo list too, but doesn't seems to response:-(> > ps. anyway what is the status of the new indexing code and the thread > > view bug? > > thanks. > > I've been promising to get new indexing code to work at the beginning of > February, hopefully I'm able to do that :) Next actual release then > probably at the end of February.we're waiting it, since I'd like to merge all of our mail server. but it's about 400 mailbox. and two week ago we have to restore all mailbox from the backup which cause that dovecot has to reindex all mailbox. which result a load 10-15 on a dual xeon. so I assume it's again the IO load. we have to manualy stop and start dovecot for about 3 hours to be able to manage the load...> The indexing code itself is about 80% implemented, next big thing is > that most of maildir/mbox handling code needs rewriting.. > > Thread view bug? .. You probably mean that new mails show up under some > very old mails and gets kind of lost. If I change that behaviour I'll > break RFC compatibility. There was some talk about adding some new > extension to THREAD to change it's behaviour, but no-one's tried to push > it recently.:-( -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"