http://procontrol.fi/test/ - Crashfix for multipart messages - More optimized mbox rewriting, should be "good enough" for most uses I think. I've been using it for a while now, seems to work. Still some problems: imap(cras): Apr 15 01:48:48 Warning: Our dotlock file /home/cras/mail//full-disclosure.lock was overridden And I'm sure it wasn't. Or at least shouldn't have been. Have to look more into this..
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 16:13:12 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://procontrol.fi/test/ > > - Crashfix for multipart messages > - More optimized mbox rewriting, should be "good enough" for most uses I > think. I've been using it for a while now, seems to work. > > Still some problems: > > imap(cras): Apr 15 01:48:48 Warning: Our dotlock file /home/cras/mail//full-disclosure.lock was overridden > > And I'm sure it wasn't. Or at least shouldn't have been. Have to look > more into this.. >Not Found The requested URL /test was not found on this server.
I tried installing test4, got the same problems as before (Corrupted folder messages, continuous "child xxxx (imap) killed with signal 11" messages coming fast and furious-- which is curious because there just aren't that many imap connections coming in). I put back *just* the pop3 and imap images from the 0.99.8.1 release (and left the newer dovecot, -auth, and -login images installed)- this hybrid runs OK. (I hope there are no issues mixing them this way.) Now here is an odd thing: If I run with the new imap image and the older pop3 image (from 0.99.8.1), I see none of these new errors. If I run with the new pop3 image and the older imap image, I see all of the new errors (including the rapid "imap killed with signal 11" messages). Still no coredumps.. are these phantom imap children? mm