On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. >>>> >>>> Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) >>>> >>> Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work >>> you are doing! >>> >>> Or you as sysadmin know that and just being ironic? >>> >>> Valeri >>> >> >> To be clear, I was being ironic. Hence the smiley face. >> >> I just wanted to start a thread for future updates to appear in. >> > > There are 270 SRPMs that need to be built .. of those 18 require > modification for branding. All the mods have been applied and a build > consisting of those 270 SRPMs has been queued. > > As of right now (time of writing this mail), we are still building in > pass 1 .. so far 236 of the 270 SRPMs have tried to build, 15 have had > some sort of failure and the rest have built fine. > > Working right now to figure out the failures and will resubmit those > once the first pass of all 270 completes. > > Thanks, > Johnny HughesSending a digital $drink... :) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/ "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein?s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay Gould
On 03/22/2017 05:11 PM, Digimer wrote:> On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. >>>>> >>>>> Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) >>>>> >>>> Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work >>>> you are doing! >>>> >>>> Or you as sysadmin know that and just being ironic? >>>> >>>> Valeri >>>> >>> >>> To be clear, I was being ironic. Hence the smiley face. >>> >>> I just wanted to start a thread for future updates to appear in. >>> >> >> There are 270 SRPMs that need to be built .. of those 18 require >> modification for branding. All the mods have been applied and a build >> consisting of those 270 SRPMs has been queued. >> >> As of right now (time of writing this mail), we are still building in >> pass 1 .. so far 236 of the 270 SRPMs have tried to build, 15 have had >> some sort of failure and the rest have built fine. >> >> Working right now to figure out the failures and will resubmit those >> once the first pass of all 270 completes. >> > > Sending a digital $drink... :) >OK .. current status on CentOS-6.9 testing: We have a CR tree (see this link if you don't know what CR is http://bit.ly/2mWkdq7 ) We have been testing this tree for several hours in QA and have made some corrections. If we don't find any deal breaking errors, the plan is to push the CR repo to 6.8 tree tomorrow at 1600 UTC .. it will take a couple hours to get to all of mirror.centos.org. So expect some announcements on the CR-Annoucne list tomorrow: https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-cr-announce Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170323/8a4ccece/attachment-0001.sig>
> > > OK .. current status on CentOS-6.9 testing: > > We have a CR tree (see this link if you don't know what CR is > http://bit.ly/2mWkdq7 ) > > We have been testing this tree for several hours in QA and have made > some corrections. > > If we don't find any deal breaking errors, the plan is to push the CR > repo to 6.8 tree tomorrow at 1600 UTC .. it will take a couple hours to > get to all of mirror.centos.org. > > So expect some announcements on the CR-Annoucne list tomorrow: > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-cr-announce > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > >Thanks Johnny and the CentOS team for all your hard work, commitment and dedication to this community. Thanks again -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez
On 03/23/2017 06:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 03/22/2017 05:11 PM, Digimer wrote: >> On 22/03/17 05:31 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 03/22/2017 08:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>>>> Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) >>>>>> >>>>> Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work >>>>> you are doing! >>>>> >>>>> Or you as sysadmin know that and just being ironic? >>>>> >>>>> Valeri >>>>> >>>> >>>> To be clear, I was being ironic. Hence the smiley face. >>>> >>>> I just wanted to start a thread for future updates to appear in. >>>> >>> >>> There are 270 SRPMs that need to be built .. of those 18 require >>> modification for branding. All the mods have been applied and a build >>> consisting of those 270 SRPMs has been queued. >>> >>> As of right now (time of writing this mail), we are still building in >>> pass 1 .. so far 236 of the 270 SRPMs have tried to build, 15 have had >>> some sort of failure and the rest have built fine. >>> >>> Working right now to figure out the failures and will resubmit those >>> once the first pass of all 270 completes. >>> >> >> Sending a digital $drink... :) >> > > > OK .. current status on CentOS-6.9 testing: > > We have a CR tree (see this link if you don't know what CR is > http://bit.ly/2mWkdq7 ) > > We have been testing this tree for several hours in QA and have made > some corrections. > > If we don't find any deal breaking errors, the plan is to push the CR > repo to 6.8 tree tomorrow at 1600 UTC .. it will take a couple hours to > get to all of mirror.centos.org. > > So expect some announcements on the CR-Annoucne list tomorrow: > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-cr-announce >OK guys, the CR release has happened. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170324/7884d25a/attachment-0001.sig>