search for: resubmit

Hello, My question has to do with a form resubmit problem. Say for example a form is submitted and within that form, a picture is uploaded. If the user presses the Back buttom and gets back to the form submission sheet, and then clicks on resubmit, once again, the same data is populated into my tables wasting space (another picture upload for no...

...to sieve. While doing so I often found that I'd like to filter a bunch of messages (with "bunch" in the area of 1-10K) with my shiny new sieve script. I found in the wiki a way to do that: http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/RefilterMail And it works well, it picks the mails via IMAP and resubmits them to dovecot-lda. But unfortunately the IMAP flags including \Sent, \Flagged etc are lost in the process. I started checking for other solutions beside getmail that might extract the imap flags as well, but I wouldn't know how to pass them to dovecot-lda. Would it make sense to suggest to...

Do I need to resubmit this patch? It has been over two weeks now since it was originally submitted, and a week and a half since I last sent out an email following up. I'm just wondering if there is some list I missed as I am assuming the maintainers and lists I contacted here are correct? It looks like we are at RC7...

...showed some interest among the community. Folks seemed to agree that DebugInfo is a good place to put implementation in. Next there was submission by Pete Cooper (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15535). It completely covered the issue. However it was reverted due to some windows test failures and wasn’t resubmitted since. While I was adapting Pete’s parser for our needs I have found a couple of small issues in it. However I can’t check if they were causing original failures. So the question is what is the right way of moving this forward? I can resubmit original Pete’s change with my fixes and see if it w...

Just following up. It has been a week since I submitted this. I was hoping we could get it in for 5.7 since this affects free page reporting which will be introduced with that kernel release. Thanks. - Alex On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:40 AM Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck at linux.intel.com> > > We should

This patch adds a cscope option to the Mini-OS makefile. It also adds "cscope.*" globally to ".hgignore" Signed-off-by Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@unisys.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Subject: staging: hv: Fix missing functions for net_device_ops Unlike in older kernels, ether_setup() no longer sets default functions. We need to put them into net_device_ops. For example, eth_change_mtu prevents setting MTU beyond 1500. This is necessary because we don't support jumbo frame at this time. It affects kernel 2.6.32 and

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Subject: staging: hv: Fix missing functions for net_device_ops Unlike in older kernels, ether_setup() no longer sets default functions. We need to put them into net_device_ops. For example, eth_change_mtu prevents setting MTU beyond 1500. This is necessary because we don't support jumbo frame at this time. It affects kernel 2.6.32 and

...ility can be used to create aliases for several queues, for example, a .bashrc containing alias MYQ="RQ_Q=/path/to/myq rq" alias MYQ2="RQ_Q=/path/to/myq2 rq" would allow syntax like MYQ2 submit < joblist MODES rq operates in modes create, submit, resubmit, list, status, delete, update, query, execute, configure, snapshot, lock, backup, rotate, feed, recover, ioview, and help, and a few others. the meaning of ''mode_args'' will naturally change depending on the mode of operation. the following mode abbreviations exist, n...

...ility can be used to create aliases for several queues, for example, a .bashrc containing alias MYQ="RQ_Q=/path/to/myq rq" alias MYQ2="RQ_Q=/path/to/myq2 rq" would allow syntax like MYQ2 submit < joblist MODES rq operates in modes create, submit, resubmit, list, status, delete, update, query, execute, configure, snapshot, lock, backup, rotate, feed, recover, ioview, and help, and a few others. the meaning of ''mode_args'' will naturally change depending on the mode of operation. the following mode abbreviations exist, n...

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck at linux.intel.com> We should disable free page reporting if page poisoning is enabled but we cannot report it via the balloon interface. This way we can avoid the possibility of corrupting guest memory. Normally the page poisoning feature should always be present when free page reporting is enabled on the hypervisor, however this allows us to

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck at linux.intel.com> We should disable free page reporting if page poisoning is enabled but we cannot report it via the balloon interface. This way we can avoid the possibility of corrupting guest memory. Normally the page poisoning feature should always be present when free page reporting is enabled on the hypervisor, however this allows us to

...pport to nv50. >> >> Best Regards >> Joel Holdsworth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nouveau mailing list >> Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau >> > > Ok just resubmitted. The reason for doing it this way is that my SMTP server seems not to be compatible with get send-mail SSL or TLS. I resubmitted via my work SMTP, so hopefully it works for you now. Joel

...idiot not being able to configure his Exchange server correctly, this list has been swamped by loads of duplicate mails. There were still several hundreds of mails awaiting delivery to this list. I have removed all of those from the mail queue - so if you are missing a mail you have sent, please resubmit it, it probably was lost while I cleaned the queue as I had no way of telling those apart from the reinjections. I am sorry that I had to do that, but I am sure that you'd rather resubmit than receiving close to 1000 duplicate mails. The user reinjecting the mails has been identified and shot...

Add GS base to the HVM VCPU context returned by xc_vcpu_getcontext() Signed-off-by: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@virtuata.com> diff -r e62ab14d44af -r babbb3e0f4d3 xen/arch/x86/domctl.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c Fri Apr 20 11:36:02 2012 -0700 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c Fri Apr 20 17:55:49 2012 -0700 @@ -1592,6 +1592,12 @@ void arch_get_info_guest(struct vcpu *v,

Anthony, please pull the following changes since commit 6a4e17711442849bf2cc731ccddef5a2a2d92d29: ssh://xenbits.xen.org/home/sstabellini/git/qemu-dm.git xen_fixes_20130603

...uire that header > is the first s/g element, we need a feature bit > for this. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> I really think this has to wait until the next merge window, sorry. Please resubmit this when I open net-next back up, thanks.

...uire that header > is the first s/g element, we need a feature bit > for this. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> I really think this has to wait until the next merge window, sorry. Please resubmit this when I open net-next back up, thanks.

...or package currently fails CRAN checks on Sparc Solaris: http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metafor.html The problem is probably due to an unintended (= stupid) use of identical() in a couple tests. I have changed that to more appropriate tests using all.equal(). However, before I resubmit the package to CRAN, I would really like to make sure that the updated package passes all checks also on Sparc Solaris. The issue/question of how to test packages on Sparc Solaris has come up before: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-September/058538.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/...

...validates_confirmation_of :password, :if => Proc.new { |u| u.password.size > 0} validates_length_of :password, :within => 5..40, :on => :create My problem is that if there are issues with the user validation, the account has already been saved, so when the user fixes the fields and resubmits the validates_uniqueness_of check fails for the account (since it was already saved to the db). I''ve looked through the rdoc for ActiveRecord::Base and don''t see a method which would validate in the same way that the create_or_update method does. Thanks, Sean