On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6...> > > > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that > > kerberos based updates worked with gss again and spnego doesn't need tobe> > compiled in. > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > James, thank you for your reply. > This sounds like good news for me; I can stay planted in the accepted > CentOS repo. biosphere. > > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > > I installed bind-9.9.4 package from the CentOS repo. > I've been reading the Changes and Readme file but don't see where this > issue is addressed. > > Can you point me to the centOS announcements or release notes that deal > with the bind package and gss-spnego. > I'd like to try to understand and possibly aggregate the right info tosend> to the samba wiki maintainers. > > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | >It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5 libraries. This is the specific bug that fixed the issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068 I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote:> It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5 > libraries. > > This is the specific bug that fixed the issue: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068 > > I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear. >Zoinks! I didn't realize I was corresponding with the fellow who actually maintains this section of the Samba Wiki. :-) Thanks for your expertise and synergy between the OS and the Samba software.
On 17 Apr 2015 13:04, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:46 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5 > > libraries. > > > > This is the specific bug that fixed the issue: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068 > > > > I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear. > > > > > Zoinks! I didn't realize I was corresponding with the fellow who actually > maintains this section of the Samba Wiki. :-) > Thanks for your expertise and synergy between the OS and the Sambasoftware. Just to be clear I don't do that. However I have had a fair bit of my professional life in the realm of samba in an AD context on CentOS this past year. I happen to know someone who does maintain that wiki though so will give him the heads up over drinks in a few weeks ;)