Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "zoinks".
Did you mean:
zoinks3
2015 Apr 17
1
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
...y but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> > libraries.
> >
> > This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068
> >
> > I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear.
> >
>
>
> Zoinks! I didn't realize I was corresponding with the fellow who actually
> maintains this section of the Samba Wiki. :-)
> Thanks for your expertise and synergy between the OS and the Samba
software.
Just to be clear I don't do that.
However I have had a fair bit of my professional life...
2015 Apr 17
2
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6
...
> >
> > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that
> > kerberos based updates worked
2006 Dec 01
3
"All resource specifications require names": wot?
...pache(conf) {
$name = httpd
package { $name:
install => true
}
file { $conf:
source => $conf
}
service { $name:
running => true,
requires => [file[$conf], package[$name]]
}
file {
"/tmp/zoinks": ensure => file, mode => 755;
"/tmp/andaway": ensure => file, mode => 755
}
}
And here''s my site.pp file:
# site.pp
import "apache"
node cc62-3 {
apache {
conf => "/sysadmin/puppet/services/apache2/puppet-test/httpd...
2015 Apr 17
0
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
...;
wrote:
> It wasn't the bind package directly but rather an issue with the libkrb5
> libraries.
>
> This is the specific bug that fixed the issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087068
>
> I'll get the samba wiki updated to make this clear.
>
Zoinks! I didn't realize I was corresponding with the fellow who actually
maintains this section of the Samba Wiki. :-)
Thanks for your expertise and synergy between the OS and the Samba software.
2018 Sep 21
1
per share way to not follow msdfs links
Chad W Seys <cwseys at physics.wisc.edu> writes:
>> Yep, sounds like a bug indeed. You still have the option to edit the smb.conf
>> on the server side if you want to use smb2+.
>
> Good to keep in mind.
> I'm speculating leaving 'nodfs' out of smb2+ was purposeful. Originally
> it was a workaround for Samba 3.something . Maybe the cifs authors were