CentOS - Jun 2013 - CESA-2013:0898 & CEBA-2013:0902, centos 5.9 repodata not pushed?

Johnny (& other CentOS folks),
Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the centos
mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for CentOS 5.9 updates
not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?

I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos servers was
updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message going out, unless I
also see a message from one of the admins indicating an issue, so I am very
confused.

Thanks for the feedback.

repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08
CESA-2013:0898 mesa        email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 03-Jun-2013
22:45
CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils  email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 06-Jun-2013
14:55

[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/
[2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D
[3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019773.html
[4] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019779.html

Even when this disclaimer is not here:
I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the
terms of any contract.

On 06/11/2013 11:07 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
wrote:
> Johnny (& other CentOS folks),
> Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the centos
mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for CentOS 5.9 updates
not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?
>
> I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos servers was
updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message going out, unless I
also see a message from one of the admins indicating an issue, so I am very
confused.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08
> CESA-2013:0898 mesa        email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
03-Jun-2013 22:45
> CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils  email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
06-Jun-2013 14:55
>
> [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/
> [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D
> [3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019773.html
> [4] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019779.html
>
I have just pushed a metadata update to clear out any possible issues as
it was easy to do and should make all the mirrors update, etc.

Should be on all mirror.centos.org in 30 minutes.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20130611/a43fc86d/attachment-0005.sig>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnny Hughes [mailto:johnny at centos.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:16
> To: centos at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CESA-2013:0898 & CEBA-2013:0902,centos 5.9
> repodata not pushed?
> 
> On 06/11/2013 11:07 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> wrote:
> > Johnny (& other CentOS folks),
> > Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the
> centos mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for
> CentOS 5.9 updates not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?
> >
> > I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos
> servers was updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message
> going out, unless I also see a message from one of the admins
> indicating an issue, so I am very confused.
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08
> > CESA-2013:0898 mesa        email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
> 03-Jun-2013 22:45
> > CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils  email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
> 06-Jun-2013 14:55
> >
> > [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/
> > [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D
> > [3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-
> June/019773.html
> > [4] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-
> June/019779.html
> >
> 
> I have just pushed a metadata update to clear out any possible issues
> as
> it was easy to do and should make all the mirrors update, etc.
> 
> Should be on all mirror.centos.org in 30 minutes.
Thanks for clearing that up.

Even when this disclaimer is not here:
I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or
modify the terms of any contract.