I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their any reason not to use the .rpm install of for centos? I have always used the .tar file but this time used the rpm and it appeared to install and not crash. I went ahead and did the glib correction but I was wondering if using the rpm was not the rght thing to do, Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100110/4c9de7d0/attachment-0002.html>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote:> I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their > any reason not to use the .rpm install of ?for centos? ?I have always used > the .tar file but this time used the rpm and it appeared to install and not > crash. ?I went ahead and did the glib correction but I was wondering if > using the rpm was not the rght thing to do, Thanks.I personally do not see anything wrong with using the rpm to install VMware Server. Akemi
Thanks, rpms have made me lazy ;) On 1/11/10, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com> wrote: >> I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their >> any reason not to use the .rpm install of ?for centos? ?I have always used >> the .tar file but this time used the rpm and it appeared to install and >> not >> crash. ?I went ahead and did the glib correction but I was wondering if >> using the rpm was not the rght thing to do, Thanks. > > I personally do not see anything wrong with using the rpm to install > VMware Server. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >