CentOS - May 2008 - Centosplus vmware kernels....???

OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
kernels for centos. I have read this
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189about the tick divider but it
wasn't clear what the best step forward is for
centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it looked
like that and the divider option caused a problem.  I have in the past
compiled my own but was wondering what others were now doing, thanks in
advance 8-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080527/39125611/attachment-0005.html>

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <bishoptf at gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
> kernels for centos. I have read this
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189
> about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward
is for
> centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it looked
> like that and the divider option caused a problem.  I have in the past
> compiled my own but was wondering what others were now doing, thanks in
> advance 8-)
Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here:

http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/

and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with
these kernels.

Akemi