Tony Mountifield
2008-Nov-20 10:43 UTC
[CentOS] Why noapic acpi=off on new Centos 4.6 system?
I just installed CentOS 4.6 (because I had 4.6 media handy) on a new system, which has a SuperMicro PDSMi mobo with an E4600 CPU. I then did yum update to get to 4.7, although I don't think that's relevant to my query. I wondered why "shutdown -h" would not power down the system. I then also discovered that the soft power button did not initiate a switch to runlevel 0 to do a controlled shutdown. When I looked in grub.conf, I discovered that the installer had included the boot parameters "noapic acpi=off". I removed them and rebooted, and then found that both soft shutdown from the power button and the final poweroff worked fine. I haven't stressed the system yet, but it seems to boot and run fine. My question is (at last): why did the installer decide it necessary to include "noapic acpi=off"? Previous installs of CentOS on other hardware have not done that. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 10:43 +0000, Tony Mountifield wrote:> I just installed CentOS 4.6 (because I had 4.6 media handy) on a new > system, which has a SuperMicro PDSMi mobo with an E4600 CPU. > > I then did yum update to get to 4.7, although I don't think that's > relevant to my query. > > I wondered why "shutdown -h" would not power down the system. I then > also discovered that the soft power button did not initiate a switch > to runlevel 0 to do a controlled shutdown. > > When I looked in grub.conf, I discovered that the installer had included > the boot parameters "noapic acpi=off". I removed them and rebooted, and > then found that both soft shutdown from the power button and the final > poweroff worked fine. I haven't stressed the system yet, but it seems > to boot and run fine. > > My question is (at last): why did the installer decide it necessary to > include "noapic acpi=off"? Previous installs of CentOS on other hardware > have not done that.---- I don't believe that anaconda would do that on its own. It would however, append any kernel options that you used when you booted the installation disk so that's the likely place where it came from. Craig
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it
- Bug#795330: [Xen-devel] Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it
- Bug#795330: Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it
- Re: noapic in /etc/libguestfs-tools.conf
- Bug#795330: [Xen-devel] Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it