I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to ask a redhat question :-) Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very similar to CentOS' problem, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635 My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue? TIA
Mag Gam wrote:> I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to > ask a redhat question :-) > > Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where > the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very > similar to CentOS' problem, > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635 > > My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue?Update to 5.2 Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080725/17ed5684/attachment-0001.sig>
Not an option at my university :-( On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote:> Mag Gam wrote: >> I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to >> ask a redhat question :-) >> >> Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where >> the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very >> similar to CentOS' problem, >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635 >> >> My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue? > > Update to 5.2 > > Ralph > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >
on 7-25-2008 4:06 AM Mag Gam spake the following:> I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to > ask a redhat question :-) > > Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where > the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very > similar to CentOS' problem, > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635 > > > My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue? > > > TIACentOS didn't make that problem, they inherited it from RedHat. 5.2 is supposed to fix that. Update when you can. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080725/5356e0d3/attachment-0001.sig>