I've noticed quite a few of these India consulting companies using the
mailing lists to supplement their lack of internal skilled personnel.
It really gives me pause when/if I need to consider outsourcing technology work.
The fact that these companies are not upfront about their knowledge base and
what they are truly capable of handling makes me wonder if this is really the
most cost effective way to go.
-Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Sent: Thu Dec 13 08:34:04 2007
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Suitable VPN RPM on centos 5?
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Peer IP: 194.237.227.202 <http://194.237.227.202>
<http://194.237.227.202>
Server IP: 192.168.0.2 <http://192.168.0.2> <http://192.168.0.2>
/ 255.255.255.255
<http://255.255.255.255> <http://255.255.255.255>
Pre-shared key: d769hdsKJ
Ike, Phase1: 3des, sha, dh2
Ipsec, Phase2: 3des, sha
I hope you realise that by posting such information you have just
compromised the site.
I'm not sure I entirely understand why this list has become what appears to
be backend support for Indunil Jayasooriya's company.
-- jeremy
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071213/e1891ba8/attachment-0002.html>
